Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And taxpayers still subsidize the arenas. (Original Post) SarahD Feb 2024 OP
IIRC, Marc Davis kicked in $500 million and the OTHER 1.5 BILLION is from taxpayers (and visitors, of course) usonian Feb 2024 #1
Someone has to explain to me Raven123 Feb 2024 #2
It's the same myth that... calguy Feb 2024 #3
The Titans are building a new stadium in Nashville Docreed2003 Feb 2024 #4
We're having the same issue here in Kansas City... NewDayOranges Feb 2024 #5
I definitely think it should be completely up to the voters jimfields33 Feb 2024 #6

usonian

(13,861 posts)
1. IIRC, Marc Davis kicked in $500 million and the OTHER 1.5 BILLION is from taxpayers (and visitors, of course)
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 06:24 PM
Feb 2024

My sneaky question is “Will the Raiders players have to pay to watch their two worst enemies play IN THEIR OWN STADIUM?

Not that it really matters.

I believe that the 49ers Santa Clara stadium and the SF Giants field were privately paid for.

Raven123

(6,050 posts)
2. Someone has to explain to me
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 06:32 PM
Feb 2024

How is it that taxpayers pay for stadiums and games are played outside of the USA. Professional sports claims they bring jobs to local communities, but I have yet to see a “local” working when the game is played in England or Germany.

calguy

(5,768 posts)
3. It's the same myth that...
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 06:35 PM
Feb 2024

Cutting taxes on the wealthiest individuals will somehow benefit the poorest individuals.

Docreed2003

(17,809 posts)
4. The Titans are building a new stadium in Nashville
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 06:39 PM
Feb 2024

It's on tap to wildly exceed the public costs of other new stadiums. All this for a franchise that can't seem to figure out how to win.

NewDayOranges

(727 posts)
5. We're having the same issue here in Kansas City...
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 08:51 PM
Feb 2024

This city spent $250 million taxpayer funds to renovate/update The K (home of the KC Royals) in 2012 and $375 million in 2010 to renovate/update Arrowhead Stadium (home of the Chiefs)...

And now 12 and 14 years down the road, all of a sudden these stadiums are DUMPS and need to be rebuilt from scratch on the taxpayer dime? I don't think so!

I love the Chiefs and the Royals and I hope both teams stay in Kansas City for a very long time but considering that the football team is a revenue-sharing business that earns billions a year for its owner from television revenues for its owners before selling a single ticket, I'm not for spending billions of taxpayer $ to subsidize billionaires who earn billions every year...

I will be voting against any tax increase for building new stadiums but I expect a tax levy for new stadiums to pass resoundingly regardless...

jimfields33

(18,905 posts)
6. I definitely think it should be completely up to the voters
Sun Feb 4, 2024, 09:02 PM
Feb 2024

That’s really the best way to handle it in a democracy.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»And taxpayers still subsi...