Andrew Luck or Russell Wilson?

[pscot]

Which one would you rather have?

[Angleae]

1. Right now Russel Wilson.

He keeps finding ways to win, especially considering the injuries the Seattle offensive has.

[Inkfreak]

2. Tuff choice. I'll take Luck in the long run.

I like the guy a lot. He's great in interviews and shows a real passion & skill while playing. Not to take anything away from Wilson, but that Seattle D is unreal. It's been the big factor in their wins. I like Seattle to take the NFC.

[pscot]

4. When Wilson has it going

the game just seems to slow down around him. He's been taking a pounding because the O line has collapsed, but they keep winning. I've only seen Luck play a couple of times but he's an amazing talent. It does look like Wilson will be the first one to play in a super bowl.

[Inkfreak]

6. Add in the fact he's smaller

by NFL standards, its incredible how well he does. And his receiver core is kinda on the low end of the scale. Rice was a ghost & Tate is the guy simply because there is no other deep threat. I'm anxious to see how Harvin will enhance the offense.

So I think we just convinced myself to change my answer to Wilson. Well played.

[Capt. Obvious]

3. This week, Wilson

He's going up against Minn and should put more than the 18 spot Luck got.

[Boom Sound 416]

5. Luck

over just about every one

[geek tragedy]

7. Luck. But Wilson's team is much better. nt