Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Thu Aug 5, 2021, 12:32 PM Aug 2021

Washington NFL team bans fans from wearing Native American dress

The Washington Football Team, which dropped the controversial name Redskins last year, has now banned fans from wearing Native American headdresses and face paint at its home stadium. The new policy was among several the US NFL team said would help provide the "best possible fan experience for all".

The Redskins name and logo was retired by the franchise in July last year. It followed years of pressure from groups and sponsors who criticized the name as offensive to Native Americans. It said it was "excited to welcome everyone back wearing their burgundy and gold", but that Native American costumes and paint "may no longer be worn into the stadium".

Washington's NFL franchise was first named the Redskins in 1933, when they still played in Boston. It became one of the most famous names in American sports, with a logo recognized the world over.

The club has said a new team nickname will be announced next year.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58099157

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
2. Not that I imagine it's likely, but what if an actual Native person wanted to show up in one?
Thu Aug 5, 2021, 12:42 PM
Aug 2021

Be an interesting conundrum is all I'm saying.

All-in-all ... I like it.

 

brewens

(15,359 posts)
4. It could get interesting. We have the Nez Perce tribe where I'm at. You never see them in full
Thu Aug 5, 2021, 12:55 PM
Aug 2021

native dress, but a lot have clothing, beads and jewelry that identify them as Native American. I hope they don't hassle anyone for coming in like they normally dress.

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
8. F the Chiefs!
Thu Aug 5, 2021, 01:00 PM
Aug 2021

Thing is, they could get away with keeping their name if they just change their iconography/get rid of the cultural appropriation.

Unlike the WFT who's name was outright offensive and inextricable from that inherent meaning.

rsdsharp

(10,134 posts)
11. I never really understood their name.
Thu Aug 5, 2021, 01:50 PM
Aug 2021

They were originally the Dallas Texans. Their logo was the state of Texas with a star at Dallas. They couldn’t keep the name when they moved to KC, but their really isn’t anything about Missouri that screams native American to me.

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
9. That is going a little quickly IMHO, that stuff is REALLY widespread and that kind of gear
Thu Aug 5, 2021, 01:03 PM
Aug 2021

is typically expensive to buy.

Once they get a new name and couple years go by, then I think they should, but not this quick (year 2) when there's no other real name.

But if they DID, I wouldn't cry about it or anything.

jimfields33

(18,911 posts)
10. I would think the native Americans should make that decision
Thu Aug 5, 2021, 01:07 PM
Aug 2021

I’d ask the local tribes if it would be ok to transition. If they say no, I guess people will have expensive rags to wash their car.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»Washington NFL team bans ...