Soccer/Football
Related: About this forumHillsborough inquests: Fans unlawfully killed, jury concludes
Breaking news - Released today... 4/26/2016
27 Years Later
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-36138337
The inquests conclude that the 96 football fans at Hillsborough were unlawfully killed
The jury had to answer 14 questions about the cause of the 1989 disaster
Jurors decided police error caused or contributed to a dangerous situation
They found the behaviour of Liverpool fans did not contribute to the dangerous situation at the turnstiles
QUESTION 14: Emergency response and the role of South Yorkshire Metropolitan Ambulance Service (SYMAS)
Posted at 05:24
After the crush in the west terrace had begun to develop, was there any error or omission by the ambulance service (SYMAS) which caused or contributed to the loss of lives in the disaster?
Yes or no.
Yes.
SYMAS failed to ascertain the nature of the problem at Leppings Lane. The failure to recognise and call a major incident led to delays in response to the emergency.
QUESTION 13: Emergency response and the role of South Yorkshire Police
Posted at 05:22
After the crush in the West Terrace had begun to develop, was there any error or omission by the police which caused or contributed to the loss of lives in the disaster?
Yes or no.
Yes.
Police delayed to call major incident - it meant appropriate emergency response was delayed.
QUESTION 12: Conduct of Eastwood & Partners (SWFC engineers)
Posted at 05:21
Should Eastwood & Partners have done more to detect and advise on any unsafe or unsatisfactory features of the stadium which caused or contributed to the disaster?
Yes or no.
Yes.
Eastwood & Partners, the clubs consultant engineers, did not make their own calculations when they became consultants for the club. Therefore the initial capacity figures and all subsequent calculations were incorrect.
Eastwood & Partners failed to recalculate capacity figures each time changes were made to the terraces. It failed to update the safety certificate after 1986.
QUESTION 11: Conduct of Sheffield Wednesday FC on the day of the match
Posted at 05:19
Was there any error or omission by SWFC and its staff on 15 April 1989 which caused or contributed to the dangerous situation that developed at the Leppings Lane turnstiles and in the west terrace?
Yes or no.
No.
Was there any error or omission by SWFC and its staff on 15 April 1989 which may have caused or contributed to the dangerous situation that developed at the Leppings Lane turnstiles and in the west terrace?
Yes or no.
Yes.
Club officials were aware huge number of fans were still outside the ground at 2.40 and should have requested delay in kick-off.
QUESTION 10: Conduct of Sheffield Wednesday FC before the day of the match
Posted at 05:18
Was there any error or omission by SWFC and its staff in the management of the stadium and/or preparation for the semi final match on 15 April 1989 which caused or contributed to the dangerous situation which developed on the day of the match?
Yes or no.
Yes -
The club did not approve the plans for dedicated turnstiles for each pen. The club did not agree any contingency plans with the police. There was inadequate signage and inadequate and misleading information on the tickets.
QUESTION 9: Licensing and oversight of the stadium
Posted at 05:16
Was there any error or omission in the safety certification and oversight of Hillsborough Stadium that caused or contributed to the disaster?
Yes or no.
Yes.
Safety certificate never amended to reflect changes to Leppings Lane end of stadium.
QUESTION 8: Defects in Hillsborough stadium
Posted at 05:15
Were there any features of the design, construction and layout of the stadium which you consider were dangerous or defective and which caused or contributed to the disaster?
Yes or no.
Yes
Fans were contained in pens and separated from the pitch by steel fences
Design and layout of the crush barriers in pens 3 and 4 were not fully compliant with the Green Guide. The removal of barrier 144 and the partial removal of barrier 136 would have exacerbated the waterfall effect of pressure towards the front of the pens. The lack of dedicated turnstiles for individual pens meant that capacities could not be monitored. There were too few turnstiles for a capacity crowd. Signage to the side pens was inadequate.
QUESTION 7: Behaviour of the supporters
Posted at 05:14
Was there any behaviour on the part of the football supporters which caused or contributed to the dangerous situation at the Leppings Lane turnstiles?
Yes or no.
No.
Was there any behaviour on the part of the football supporters which may have caused or contributed to the dangerous situation at the Leppings Lane turnstiles?
Yes or no.
No.
QUESTION 6: Determination on unlawful killing issue
Posted at 05:13
Are you satisfied, so that you are sure, that those who died in the disaster were unlawfully killed?
Yes or no.
Yes
QUESTION 5: The opening of the gates
Posted at 05:12
When the order was given to open the exit gates at the Leppings Lane end of the stadium, was there any error or omission by the commanding officers in the control box which caused or contributed to the crush on the terrace?
Yes or no.
Yes.
Commanding officers did not inform officers in the inner concourse prior to the opening of Gate C. Commanding Officers failed to consider where fans would go. Commanding officers failed to order the closure of the central tunnel prior to the opening of gate C.
QUESTION 4: Policing of the match and the crush on the terrace
Posted at 05:11
Was there any error or omission by commanding officers which caused or contributed to the crush on the terrace?
Yes or no.
Yes
Commanding officers should have ordered closing of central tunnel.
QUESTION 3: Policing of the match and the situation at the turnstiles
Posted at 05:10
Was there any error or omission in policing on the day of the match which caused or contributed to a dangerous situation developing at the Leppings Lane turnstiles?
Yes or no.
Yes.
Police response to the increasing crowd at Leppings Lane was slow and uncoordinated. The road closure and sweep of fans exacerbated the situation. No filter cordons were place. No contingency plans were made for the sudden arrival of a large number of fans.
Attempts to close the perimeter gates were made too late.
A plan to redesign the turnstiles at the Leppings Lane end was discussed five years before the disaster.
QUESTION 2: Police planning for the semi-final match
Posted at 05:09
Was there any error or omission in police planning or preparation for the semi-final match on 15 April 1989 which caused or contributed to the dangerous situation that developed on the day of the match?
Yes or no
Yes
The jury feels there were major omissions in 1989 operational order
QUESTION 1: Basic facts of the disaster
Posted at 05:08
Do you agree with the following statement which is intended to summarise the basic facts of the Disaster:
Ninety-six people died as a result of the Disaster at Hillsborough Stadium on 15 April 1989 due to crushing in the central pens of the Leppings Lane terrace, following the admission of a large number of supporters to the Stadium through exit gates.
Yes.
&feature=player_embedded
BlueCollar
(3,859 posts)Written by Dave Kirby in 2002
A schoolboy holds a leather ball
in a photograph on a bedroom wall
the bed is made, the curtains drawn
as silence greets the break of dawn.
The dusk gives way to morning light
revealing shades of red and white
which hang from posters locked in time
of the Liverpool team of 89.
Upon a pale white quilted sheet
a football kit is folded neat
with a yellow scarf, trimmed with red
and some football boots beside the bed.
In hope, the room awakes each day
to see the boy who used to play
but once again it wakes alone
for this young boys not coming home.
Outside, the springtime fills the air
the smell of life is everywhere
violas bloom and tulips grow
while daffodils dance heel to toe.
These should have been such special times
for a boy whod now be in his prime
but spring forever turned to grey
in the Yorkshire sun, one April day.
The clock was locked on 3.06
as sun shone down upon the pitch
lighting up faces etched in pain
as death descended on Leppings Lane.
Between the bars an arm is raised
amidst a human tidal wave
a young hand yearning to be saved
grows weak inside this deathly cage.
A boy not barely in his teens
is lost amongst the dying screams
a body too frail to fight for breath
is drowned below a sea of death
His outstretched arm then disappears
to signal thirteen years of tears
as 96 souls of those who fell
await the toll of the justice bell.
Ever since that disastrous day
a vision often comes my way
I reach and grab his outstretched arm
then pull him up away from harm.
We both embrace with tear-filled eyes
I then awake to realise
its the same old dream I have each week
as I quietly cry myself to sleep.
On April the 15th every year
when all is calm and skies are clear
beneath a glowing Yorkshire moon
a lone scots piper plays a tune.
The tune rings out the justice cause
then blows due west across the moors
it passes by the eternal flame
then engulfs a young boys picture frame.
His room is as it was that day
for thirteen years its stayed that way
untouched and frozen forever in time
since that tragic day in 89.
And as it plays its haunting sound
tears are heard from miles around
theyre tears from families of those who fell
awaiting the toll of the justice bell.