Religion
Related: About this forumA New Creed for the Uncertain but Faithful
"I believe in some sort of Creator, I think. I mean, where did all this come from, really? I believe that whatever that Creator is, it had something or another to do with making the Universe that surrounds us. I don't know its name, what it looks like, or where it might be, but I have a solid, unwavering hunch that the Creator probably exists, or existed at one time, or maybe more than one. I don't know, but I sure do believe. I'm not an atheist, anyway. Amen."
Pope George Ringo II
(1,896 posts)They're also often uncertain that somebody somewhere might have done something. Are you saying they can't be atheists?
With tongue planted firmly in cheek.
MineralMan
(147,606 posts)It can shake them to their core, apparently. Enough that faith in something...anything...is needed to assuage the terror.
Pope George Ringo II
(1,896 posts)I just got it out of the way.
MineralMan
(147,606 posts)Pope George Ringo II
(1,896 posts)There's no way I could have kept a straight face trying to mis-define "atheist" as "somebody who is certain where the creator came from".
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Theists don't know where the creator came from, so that's actually a pretty good definition.
Pope George Ringo II
(1,896 posts)As the created, rather than the creator.
Admittedly, getting things backwards is still in the spirit I had intended.
Bretton Garcia
(970 posts)"Believe in anything. Just don't be an atheist." Or a critical thinker.
MineralMan
(147,606 posts)"Faith in anything is better than belief in nothing." I think that's how it goes.
I'm going to call my new creed "The Indecisis Creed," I think. It's universal, and can replace all the others. It will create a new, unified religion, perhaps - one that doesn't require any specific doctrine or scripture.
"Whatever works for you works for the Creator!"
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)MineralMan
(147,606 posts)Not surprising, really.
Permanut
(6,656 posts)perfect. Gonna take some getting used to, though, calling the Creator "It". After all these centuries of patriarchal hegemony.
MineralMan
(147,606 posts)It's not a human. It's not even an animal. It's an entity. An it.
A non-existent it, I think.
Permanut
(6,656 posts)gonna have to abandon some of the old ideas. The Bible is full of nonsense, of course, but one of the most absurd ideas I see there is the notion that a creator would somehow be a "he".
MineralMan
(147,606 posts)in their own image. Since they were men, they gave it a godly penis. I mean, one of godly proportions, just like theirs, no doubt. Since they were the creators, why wouldn't they, after all?
MineralMan
(147,606 posts)Permanut
(6,656 posts)oxymoronic, is the word that comes to mind.
edhopper
(34,880 posts)Jesus had most of the answers and was somehow related to the Creator.