Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumFrance's ban on full-body Islamic veil violates human rights: U.N. rights panel
Source: Reuters
WORLD NEWS OCTOBER 23, 2018 / 5:15 AM / UPDATED 23 MINUTES AGO
France's ban on full-body Islamic veil violates human rights: U.N. rights panel
Tom Miles
3 MIN READ
GENEVA (Reuters) - The U.N. Human Rights Committee said on Tuesday that Frances ban on the niqab, the full-body Islamic veil, was a violation of human rights and called on it to review the legislation.
France had failed to make the case for its ban, the committee said, giving Paris 180 days to report back to say what actions it had taken. The panels findings are not legally binding but could influence French courts.
In particular, the Committee was not persuaded by Frances claim that a ban on face covering was necessary and proportionate from a security standpoint or for attaining the goal of living together in society, it said.
The panel of 18 independent experts oversees compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Implementation of its decisions is not mandatory, but under an optional protocol of the treaty, France has an international legal obligation to comply in good faith.
-snip-
France's ban on full-body Islamic veil violates human rights: U.N. rights panel
Tom Miles
3 MIN READ
GENEVA (Reuters) - The U.N. Human Rights Committee said on Tuesday that Frances ban on the niqab, the full-body Islamic veil, was a violation of human rights and called on it to review the legislation.
France had failed to make the case for its ban, the committee said, giving Paris 180 days to report back to say what actions it had taken. The panels findings are not legally binding but could influence French courts.
In particular, the Committee was not persuaded by Frances claim that a ban on face covering was necessary and proportionate from a security standpoint or for attaining the goal of living together in society, it said.
The panel of 18 independent experts oversees compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Implementation of its decisions is not mandatory, but under an optional protocol of the treaty, France has an international legal obligation to comply in good faith.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-islam-un/frances-ban-on-full-body-islamic-veil-violates-human-rights-u-n-rights-panel-idUSKCN1MX15K
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 991 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
France's ban on full-body Islamic veil violates human rights: U.N. rights panel (Original Post)
Eugene
Oct 2018
OP
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)1. Seems fair.
You could make a case against full-body concealment as a security issue, but it would have to be applied across the board... and it probably shouldn't be proposed by anti-immigrant crypto-fascist fuckwads with a demonstrable history of virulent xenophobia.
Major Nikon
(36,906 posts)4. It is applied across the board
All face coverings are specified by the law, not just those traditionally used by Muslim adherents.
As the OP states, the ban was upheld by France's high court and the EU.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)2. A clear example of intolerance motivated primarily by Islamophobia. eom
MineralMan
(147,652 posts)3. Yes, it is. As stated in the OP.