Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
Mon Jan 7, 2019, 12:18 PM Jan 2019

Rep. Ilhan Omar prompts new rule that allows for head coverings the first time in 181 years.

From the article:

A newly diverse House of Representatives has passed a rule that, for the first time in 181 years, allows head coverings to be worn on the House floor for religious reasons.
The rules package passed Thursday, 234 to 197, includes a number of provisions, among them several seeking to “restore inclusion and diversity.” It passed the same day the country’s first female Muslim members of Congress took office — Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, who wears a head covering. Both women are Democrats.


To read more:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2019/01/04/rep-ilhan-omar-prompts-new-rule-that-allows-first-time-years-head-coverings-house-floor/?utm_term=.4f55d63a5383

Long overdue.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Ilhan Omar prompts new rule that allows for head coverings the first time in 181 years. (Original Post) guillaumeb Jan 2019 OP
This should help anyone who would wear a yarmulke or turban too IronLionZion Jan 2019 #1
To be fair, the hat ban was never intended to be a ban on religious headgear. trotsky Jan 2019 #2
To be fair, you assume far too much. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #3
I assume nothing. I've simply read the history. trotsky Jan 2019 #4

IronLionZion

(46,987 posts)
1. This should help anyone who would wear a yarmulke or turban too
Mon Jan 7, 2019, 12:28 PM
Jan 2019

and long overdue.

at least we don't require wigs like the British

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
2. To be fair, the hat ban was never intended to be a ban on religious headgear.
Tue Jan 8, 2019, 09:52 AM
Jan 2019

So your comment that this is "long overdue" is a vague and unnecessary smear.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
4. I assume nothing. I've simply read the history.
Tue Jan 8, 2019, 01:54 PM
Jan 2019

You should do that too, instead of assigning your own imagined motives and judging others.

As is your wont, unfortunately.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Rep. Ilhan Omar prompts n...