Religion
Related: About this forumJudge says Bible is rule of the land.
Judge rules against elderly lesbians rejected from retirement homeBev Nance, 68, and Mary Walsh, 72, were denied an apartment in Missouris Friendship Village because their marriage is not understood in the Bible.
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/judge-rules-against-elderly-lesbians-rejected-retirement-home-n960211
The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,953 posts)The ruling was not that "the Bible is the rule of the land," but that federal law does not protect LGBT relationships in housing claims. Which is true, but obviously it shouldn't be. The couple brought their lawsuit on the basis of sex discrimination, which is protected by federal law, but the judge didn't accept that argument. The couple is going to appeal.
Cartoonist
(7,534 posts)He ruled using the Bible as his guide.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,953 posts)Cartoonist
(7,534 posts)their marriage is not "understood in the Bible.
_
I thought it was the judge. Article does not make it clear.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,953 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,953 posts)And you assumed the judge was male. She isn't. But those unfortunate sexist assumptions still are made frequently, just like unfortunate assumptions are still made about LGBT people.
Cartoonist
(7,534 posts)Thank you for pointing out that they can be just as dumb as men.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,953 posts)The remedy is for Congress to amend the statute to include discrimination in housing to include LGBT people.
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)There have been numerous legal attempts to argue laws against sexual discrimination must include sexual orientation. Some have been successful and some have not.
The current position of the EEOC is sexual orientation is included in laws that prohibit sexual discrimination in employment practices. While that isn't the same law that protects sexual discrimination in housing practices, it's not that much of a leap in jurisprudence.
EEOC interprets and enforces Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination as forbidding any employment discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation. These protections apply regardless of any contrary state or local laws.
Through investigation, conciliation, and litigation of charges by individuals against private sector employers, as well as hearings and appeals for federal sector workers, the Commission has taken the position that existing sex discrimination provisions in Title VII protect lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) applicants and employees against employment bias. The Commission has obtained approximately $6.4 million in monetary relief for individuals, as well as numerous employer policy changes, in voluntary resolutions of LGBT discrimination charges under Title VII since data collection began in 2013. A growing number of court decisions have endorsed the Commission's interpretation of Title VII.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,953 posts)controlling previous interpretations by the circuit court of appeals. Trial judges are pretty much stuck with the next level appellate court has decided (I once clerked for an appellate court and saw this dynamic just about every day). Maybe on appeal this couple can convince the Eight Circuit to change its mind.
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)I'm just saying changing the law may not be the only remedy.
SWBTATTReg
(24,131 posts)God, I hate this state where I live. I'm embarrassed and disgusted at the same time.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,953 posts)which is a common sexist assumption about judges. The judge also did not base her decision on the Bible or religious principles but on the particular statute relating to housing discrimination and on interpretations of that statute by the higher controlling court. https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/stltoday.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/4f/64fef240-d334-599c-929a-0fa6755a28f7/5c3fe3c00af81.pdf.pdf
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)AlexSFCA
(6,270 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,953 posts)uriel1972
(4,261 posts)Whether religion played a part in their judgement is debatable, if the Judge did not make a reference to it then they did not claim it was the law of the land.
While I despair at religious bigotry, without evidence it is tough to prove. Atheists can be as bigoted as Theists from experience.
struggle4progress
(120,314 posts)... Guided by Biblical principles that honor Jesus Christ, provide a loving, warm, gracious and secure environment where all experience physical, spiritual and emotional care ...
https://www.friendshipvillagestl.com/our-mission.html
The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,953 posts)It sounds like it's full of the sort of smug, judgmental people I'd rather not hang out with. But that's not the point. They shouldn't be able to exclude people who do want to live there.