Religion
Related: About this forumPete Buttigieg: Religious left is 'stirring'
From the article:
Buttigieg spoke with Religion News Service to discuss sin, immigration, being a religious millennial and whether he can rally the support of a burgeoning religious left movement. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
What do you see as the appropriate role of religion in American politics?
To read more:
https://religionnews.com/2019/08/29/pete-buttigieg-religious-left-is-stirring/
So Buttigieg spoke with Religion News Service. And about the religious left.
kacekwl
(7,508 posts)I like the way you talk.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)He is a relative unknown.
Funtatlaguy
(11,793 posts)Thats a non starter in a Dem primary.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)But he recognizes, and publicizes, that theists are not all conservatives. The media prefers the narrative that theists, especially Christians, are GOP voters.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)That's not a "narrative," it's the truth.
A majority of Christians voted for Trump, Romney, McCain, both Bushes, and Reagan.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)A percentage, no matter how large, is not equal to all.
That should be apparent.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)No one, here or elsewhere, has said that ALL Christians are Republicans. You are arguing against a straw man again.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)And you know this. The 2018 midterms were fucking grim.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/07/how-religious-groups-voted-in-the-midterm-elections/
Protestants fell, Catholics are 50/50 now. Bad, bad news.
That said, we need an edge in some swing states, and this might help pump us back up maybe toward 2008..
Voltaire2
(14,714 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)At long last, poor persecuted Christians, the majority of people in the USA, will feel welcome.
Fuck the non-believers though, I guess. Even though they are now the largest voting bloc among religious groups in the country.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)If so, what does it mean?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)So just make your point. If you can.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)let all of us know what you understood by the quote.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Don't you understand the article?
Tell me your interpretation, and I'll tell you if I agree or disagree, and why.
You lament there is no discussion here, and yet you won't actually put forth any effort. You just attack those who disagree or question you.
Try behaving more like this Jesus fellow you claim to admire. Show love, not hate and anger.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)You selected a quote that refutes your point, and then you reverted to your long established narrative. And that makes actual discussion impossible.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)(Citation needed.)
Argue why I'm wrong. Explain. Do you think I'm too stupid to understand you?
Voltaire2
(14,714 posts)or not that jesus?
No, silly. Metaphorical Jesus! He's always a good dude!
Mariana
(15,112 posts)Never mind that they've been dead asleep for decades, ignoring the hateful and disgusting behavior of their right-wing co-religionists. Pete Buttigieg tells us that now, finally, they are "stirring". I guess we're expected to be profoundly grateful.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Several posters, gil included, have linked to disgusting right-wing sources at times simply because it pushed their pro-religion agenda. Some have the decency to self-delete once it's pointed out to them. Some don't.
Bottom line is, for a disappointingly large number of liberal Christians, they seem more upset by atheists questioning religion than by the right-wingers who actually have power and are trampling on our rights, enabled by the power of religion that the liberal believers themselves reinforce by demanding "respect" for their views.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)Mariana
(15,112 posts)We know who the majority are, and they sure ain't silent.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)But the framing was brilliant.