Religion
Related: About this forumTrump weighs conditioning foreign aid on religious freedom
Source: Politico
The proposed change in U.S. policy could complicate relations with countries like Egypt and India.
Aides to President Donald Trump are drafting plans to condition U.S. aid to other countries on how well they treat their religious minorities, two White House officials said.
The proposal is expected to cover U.S. humanitarian and development assistance and could also be broadened to include American military aid to other countries. If the proposal becomes reality, it could have a major effect on U.S. assistance in a range of places, from Iraq to Vietnam. Its mere consideration shows how much the White House prioritizes religious freedom, an emphasis critics say is really about galvanizing Trumps evangelical Christian base.
But experts on U.S. aid also warn that picking and choosing which countries to punish could be a difficult task, not least because several countries that are partners or allies of the United States have terrible religious freedom records.
The effort comes as Trump faces an impeachment inquiry that hinges in part on whether he froze military aid to Ukraine as a way to pressure its government to investigate his political rivals.
Two White House officials confirmed the basics of the religious freedom aid-conditioning plan. They stressed that the idea is in its early stages and an executive order is still being drafted, meaning questions about, say, whether military aid will be covered remain unanswered.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/11/trump-weighs-foreign-aid-religious-freedom-069595
TheRealNorth
(9,629 posts)That have a shit record of treating Jews, Gypsies, Muslims, and every non-christian like a second-class citizen? My guess is Trump is okay with that.
bitterross
(4,066 posts)There are religions and then there is Christianity. They are thinkin of only Christianity. Though they'll lie and say they mean all religions.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)edhopper
(34,802 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)edhopper
(34,802 posts)Then no trade with Saudi Arabia, India, Pakistan, Bahrain.....
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)On one hand, I'm fine using our buying power to pressure regimes into not being dicks. On the other, most of these countries are poor already, and an embargo is not likely to shift their opinions on anything.
edhopper
(34,802 posts)I was making the distinction between foriegn aid and trade.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)I just thought it was worth exploring even as a hypothetical.
edhopper
(34,802 posts)that is a thought. Though I would rather boycott a despot like saudi Arabia than a poor country.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)...is the cost is typically passed onto the poor. The people in charge rarely suffer, e.g., Kim Jong Un.
edhopper
(34,802 posts)no_hypocrisy
(48,791 posts)exboyfil
(17,996 posts)keithbvadu2
(40,108 posts)It depends on whose religious freedom is preferable.
edhopper
(34,802 posts)should the US be denied aid?