Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumA Biblical Mystery at Oxford
A renowned scholar claimed that he discovered a first-century gospel fragment. Now hes facing allegations of antiquities theft, cover-up, and fraud.https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/06/museum-of-the-bible-obbink-gospel-of-mark/610576/
On the evening of February 1, 2012, more than 1,000 people crowded into an auditorium at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The event was a showdown between two scholars over an explosive question in biblical studies: Is the original text of the New Testament lost, or do todays Bibles contain the actual wordsthe autographsof Jesuss earliest chroniclers? On one side was Bart Ehrman, a UNC professor and atheist whose best-selling books argue that the oldest copies of Christian scripture are so inconsistent and incompleteand so few in numberthat the original words are beyond recovery. On the other was Daniel Wallace, a conservative scholar at Dallas Theological Seminary who believes that careful textual analysis can surface the New Testaments divinely inspired first draft.
They had debated twice before, but this time Wallace had a secret weapon: At the end of his opening statement, he announced that verses of the Gospel of Mark had just been discovered on a piece of papyrus from the first century. As news went in the field of biblical studies, this was a bombshell. The papyrus would be the only known Christian manuscript from the century in which Jesus is said to have lived. Its verses, moreover, closely matched those in modern Biblesevidence of the New Testaments reliability and a rebuke to liberal scholars who saw the good book not as God-given but as the messy work of generations of human hands, prone to invention and revision, mischief and mistake.
Wallace declined to name the expert whod dated the papyrus to the first centuryIve been sworn to secrecybut assured the audience that his reputation is unimpeachable. Many consider him to be the best papyrologist on the planet. The fragment, Wallace added, would appear in an academic book the next year. Though he didnt mention it onstage, Wallace had recently joined something called the Green Scholars Initiative. The program was funded by the Green family, the evangelical billionaires who own the Hobby Lobby craft-store chain. It gave handpicked scholars access to the thousands of artifacts the family had collected for their Museum of the Bible, a soaring $500 million showplace that would open a few years later near the National Mall in Washington, D.C.
Wallaces ties to the Greens made it easy for observers to connect the dots: The Mark papyrus had to be one of the manuscripts the Greens had bought for their museum. And the papyrologist who worked out its first-century date had to be the world-renowned classicist Dirk Obbink. The Greens were known to have hired him as a consultant during their antiquities buying spree. His enlistment had been a coup. A tall Nebraskan with a mop of sandy hair, Obbink was in his mid-40s in 2001 when the MacArthur Foundation awarded him a half-million-dollar genius grant. His technique for reassembling papyrus scrolls carbonized by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in a.d. 79 was a feat of three-dimensional puzzle solving.
snip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2065 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Biblical Mystery at Oxford (Original Post)
Celerity
May 2020
OP
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)1. This stuff fascinates me. I'm familiar with The Dead Sea scrolls that the sect we know as The
Essenes left and were found in modern times that throw a lot of light on the writing of the Jewish
scriptures that Christians label The Old Testament... What is revealed with these older writings is
that many different scribes were involved at different times...
GeoWilliam750
(2,540 posts)2. Fascinating!
Buzz cook
(2,586 posts)3. Wasn't a large part of
The Green collection found to be forgeries?
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)4. Yes. The article explains how their "faith" allowed them to be fleeced
hunter
(38,931 posts)5. Faith of con men.
They all got a buzz going ripping one another off, breaking the law, and otherwise engaging in unethical behavior, Greens included.
Nobody is remorseful for trading in stolen antiquities and forgeries.
They're just mad they got caught.