Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Archbishop Chaput opens mouth, inserts foot once again.
As shown here
In a stark prognosis for contemporary Catholicism, a leader of the conservative wing of the U.S. hierarchy has said that a smaller, lighter church of fewer but holier believers is preferable to one that promotes inclusion at the expense of traditional orthodoxy.
In a speech delivered Wednesday (Oct. 19) at the University of Notre Dame, Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput also suggested that many prominent Catholics are so weak in their faith that they ought to leave the church.
Chaput singled out Democrats such as Vice President Joe Biden and vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine for special criticism, linking them to the concept of a silent apostasy coined by Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI and saying Catholics who do not champion the truth of church teaching are cowards.
Losing people who are members of the church in name only is an imaginary loss, he continued. It may in fact be more honest for those who leave and healthier for those who stay. We should be focused on commitment, not numbers or institutional throw-weight."
In a speech delivered Wednesday (Oct. 19) at the University of Notre Dame, Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput also suggested that many prominent Catholics are so weak in their faith that they ought to leave the church.
Chaput singled out Democrats such as Vice President Joe Biden and vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine for special criticism, linking them to the concept of a silent apostasy coined by Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI and saying Catholics who do not champion the truth of church teaching are cowards.
Losing people who are members of the church in name only is an imaginary loss, he continued. It may in fact be more honest for those who leave and healthier for those who stay. We should be focused on commitment, not numbers or institutional throw-weight."
Could we talk Francis into busting him all the way down to simple parish priest someplace above the Arctic Circle?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1256 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Archbishop Chaput opens mouth, inserts foot once again. (Original Post)
47of74
Oct 2016
OP
rug
(82,333 posts)1. How did this douchebag ever become a Franciscan?
No Vested Interest
(5,196 posts)2. I guess many orders have their off-beat members.
Reminds me of the Jesuit Fr. Mitch Pacwa on EWTN who is no way representative of normal Jesuit thinking.
rug
(82,333 posts)3. Yeah, they keep replaying the video of his Holy Land Rosary.
He recites it as if he's chopping wood.
shrike
(3,817 posts)4. Yeah, hard to believe he is in the same order as the late great F. Mychal Judge
And one of our local Franciscans, Fr. Ed, who is pastor of one of our parishes. Great guy. But as for Chaput, I guess every order has its outliers.