Question for the group: Could you be an Atheist Christian?
I mean conceivably, say you do not believe in god but like Jesus. Say, just wanting to emulate certain aspects of him - whether fictional or true.
Would this not define a Christian more than mere theism?
A Marxist does not think Marx was god.
An Augustinian does not think St Augustine was god.
A Jungian does not think Carl Jung was god.
So why would it be so important that a Christian believes that Christ is god?
Considering he never said he was, in any of the canonical gospels.
1620rock
(2,218 posts)"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians."
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)I know it's attributed to him all over the internets, but I'm not sure he ever said that.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)All I know is there is a dog
Her name is 'Betty'
And she's a good dog
Dogs are superior to gods...
Response to Taverner (Reply #6)
Post removed
Taverner
(55,476 posts)And yes, my dog is my homegirl!
timtom
(5,314 posts)n/t
Thats my opinion
(2,001 posts)Isn't that called trolling in someone else's water? Go home.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Isn't that called trolling in someone else's water? Go home.
justgamma
(3,676 posts)I believe in Jesus and his teachings. I know that I could never believe in the wingers version of God.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)WildEyedLiberal
(12,799 posts)I believe he removed all the 'miraculous' aspects of the Gospels and left intact all of Jesus's teachings.
ETA: Jefferson was a deist, so he believed in a creator God of some power, but I do not believe he was a Christian in the sense that he believed one needed to belong to a Christian church. He was certainly a Christian in your sense of the word, though.
ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)There's a separate category for this. And remember that the word "Christ" means "Savior", so if one believes Jesus was just a man the term is meaningless, and thus "Christian" is as well. Jesuist makes sense, but Christian does not.
Of course you could most certainly be a "cultural Christian" as I'm sure most atheists in the US are, similar to atheist Jews. One guy at my work made a comment about how he needs Christmas Eve off (we are open then but close early) because he's doing a duet with his sister at church. His Facebook contains references to the Flying Spaghetti Monster and I know he is at most an agnostic.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)But organised humanism can be just as conceited and intolerant as organised christianity.
Bucky
(55,334 posts)If you anchor your ethics in Jesus's teachings, it'd be entirely appropriate to call yourself Christian, even if you don't buy into the cosmology of salvation and heaven and whatnot. Of course it might be less confusing if such people called themselves "Jesusites" or something, but the Jesuits kind of cornered that market already.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)That would include himself - He showed us how to be a child of God. To detach those ethics from the connection with God, to sever that connection, is not very Christian: because it takes away from Jesus' message.
He once summerised his teachings as: Love your neighbour as you love yourself, and love God with all your heart, all your strength, all your wisdom. You can't just abbreviate that to "love the neighbour as you love yourself".
To take God out of Christ's teachings is like taking the vegetables out of your next meal: no doubt it's still palatable, but it's not the same anymore - and certainly not as healthy as it used to be.
sweetloukillbot
(12,608 posts)Or are Unitarians the opposite - God w/o religion? I dunno.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)UU Christians are a minority in UUism for the most part (which is ironic, considering Unitarianism and Universalism both began as liberal Christian movements), but they're out there. King's Chapel in Boston, I believe, is Unitarian and very Christian.
The UU fellowship I attend has a mixture of humanists, people attracted to Eastern philosophies, some Christians, atheists, a couple New Age types, many who are seeking. They're mostly politically liberal, but there are theologically open-minded political conservatives who attend as well.
Although all UU denominations in the UUA adhere to the 7 Principles (http://www.uua.org/beliefs/principles/index.shtml), the democratic process is a big part of UUism so it's up to the members of each church/congregation/fellowship to determine the prevailing ethos of their community.
Thats my opinion
(2,001 posts)To say Jesus is God is the wrong question with the wrong answer for many thoughtful people.
In my book "Building an Biblical Faith," I put it this way "Jesus is all of God we can see or imagine in human form."
Critters2
(30,889 posts)Thats my opinion
(2,001 posts)Critters2
(30,889 posts)Thats my opinion
(2,001 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Tripod
(854 posts)Kurmudgeon
(1,751 posts)John 11:25 "Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:"
And that isn't even counting all the times He prayed to God directly.
He wouldn't have done that if He didn't expect, didn't KNOW that God was there.
If you are a Christian, then you believe fully what Jesus Christ preached.
You can respect or honor Christ and not be a Christian.
However, you can't be a Christian if you don't believe fully what Jesus Christ said.
You believe or you don't, there's no half way.
supernova
(39,345 posts)this is a group for liberal xtians, both in terms of theology and politics.
The Christian community is all over the map when it comes to what individuals believe about the Resurrection. You are going to get a variety of answers on that subject even here. Me for example, I'm agnostic, at best, on the subject of the Resurrection.
BB_Troll
(65 posts)Jesus did claim to be God and claimed to be the expected Messiah. Did he lie about that?
54anickel
(22,453 posts)The etomology of the word believe is facinating in and of itself. Prior to the enlightment you "believed" in a person. Meaning you trusted, had faith in that person. The root of the word believe is beloved.
Now we relate the notion of belief not in a person, but in statements. It has been narrowed into belief in a statement as being true or false. Quite different than "believing" in a person to be loving, trustworthy, honorable.
Joseph8th
(228 posts)azmaximillian
(14 posts)No, The word Christian has a traditional and historic meaning. I respect your right to believe as you wish. But we need to have a language with meanings.