Science
Related: About this forumAnnoying Peeve: Naming substances after the institution at which they are discovered sucks.
So today I'm reading a paper with this title: Selective Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Mine Ore by Cr-MIL MetalOrganic Frameworks (Charith Fonseka, Seongchul Ryu, Youngwoo Choo, Mark Mullett, Ramesh Thiruvenkatachari, Gayathri Naidu, and Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2021 9 (50), 16896-16904)
MIL? What the hell is MIL? Metal ionic liquid? Methylisoleucine? I looked up the synthesis in the supplementary data, nothing "MIL-like" was there either.
No, I had to poke around.
MIL is "Matérial Institut Lavoisier"
Another example of this stuff - metal organic framework (MOF) people do this a lot is UiO-66, a famous MOF named after the University of Oslo.
This kind of thing is not helpful to young people, or, speaking only for myself, old people either.
Pet Peeve over.
eppur_se_muova
(37,407 posts)NNadir
(34,666 posts)It's a wonderful read.
eppur_se_muova
(37,407 posts)NNadir
(34,666 posts)...if it's still in print.
Response to NNadir (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
eppur_se_muova
(37,407 posts)NNadir
(34,666 posts)Personally, that was probably a better way to teach Organic Chemistry. One of the things that always annoyed me when non-chemists who talked about having to take organic chemistry for some other field complained "it's all memorization."
No, it's all mechanism, I think. Somewhere in my library is Lowry and Richardson's Theory and Mechanism in Organic Chemistry.
Organic synthesis used to be my life, but it's been many years since I even opened an organic chemistry monograph. I ended up in analytical chemistry, something of a surprise to me, but I got here by being there I guess.
Sigh...