Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(34,666 posts)
Mon Dec 27, 2021, 04:04 PM Dec 2021

Annoying Peeve: Naming substances after the institution at which they are discovered sucks.

So today I'm reading a paper with this title: Selective Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Mine Ore by Cr-MIL Metal–Organic Frameworks (Charith Fonseka, Seongchul Ryu, Youngwoo Choo, Mark Mullett, Ramesh Thiruvenkatachari, Gayathri Naidu, and Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2021 9 (50), 16896-16904)

MIL? What the hell is MIL? Metal ionic liquid? Methylisoleucine? I looked up the synthesis in the supplementary data, nothing "MIL-like" was there either.

No, I had to poke around.

MIL is "Matérial Institut Lavoisier"

Another example of this stuff - metal organic framework (MOF) people do this a lot is UiO-66, a famous MOF named after the University of Oslo.

This kind of thing is not helpful to young people, or, speaking only for myself, old people either.

Pet Peeve over.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NNadir

(34,666 posts)
4. Yes, correct. It's a Wiley publication, and goes back to 1997, but probably still a good read...
Mon Dec 27, 2021, 06:31 PM
Dec 2021

...if it's still in print.

Response to NNadir (Original post)

NNadir

(34,666 posts)
7. Well actually, I remember when we had to buy books on named reactions. One of the fun things about March's...
Mon Mar 11, 2024, 08:37 PM
Mar 2024
Advanced Organic Chemistry was that the names of reactions were stripped away in favor of a mechanistic description.

Personally, that was probably a better way to teach Organic Chemistry. One of the things that always annoyed me when non-chemists who talked about having to take organic chemistry for some other field complained "it's all memorization."

No, it's all mechanism, I think. Somewhere in my library is Lowry and Richardson's Theory and Mechanism in Organic Chemistry.

Organic synthesis used to be my life, but it's been many years since I even opened an organic chemistry monograph. I ended up in analytical chemistry, something of a surprise to me, but I got here by being there I guess.

Sigh...
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Annoying Peeve: Naming ...