Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumAt Long Last, Mathematical Proof That Black Holes Are Stable
https://www.quantamagazine.org/black-holes-finally-proven-mathematically-stable-20220804At Long Last, Mathematical Proof That Black Holes Are Stable
The solutions to Einsteins equations that describe a spinning black hole wont blow up, even when poked or prodded.
In 1963, the mathematician Roy Kerr found a solution to Einsteins equations that precisely described the space-time outside what we now call a rotating black hole. (The term wouldnt be coined for a few more years.) In the nearly six decades since his achievement, researchers have tried to show that these so-called Kerr black holes are stable. What that means, explained Jérémie Szeftel, a mathematician at Sorbonne University, is that if I start with something that looks like a Kerr black hole and give it a little bump by throwing some gravitational waves at it, for instance what you expect, far into the future, is that everything will settle down, and it will once again look exactly like a Kerr solution.
The opposite situation a mathematical instability would have posed a deep conundrum to theoretical physicists and would have suggested the need to modify, at some fundamental level, Einsteins theory of gravitation, said Thibault Damour, a physicist at the Institute of Advanced Scientific Studies in France.
In a 912-page paper posted online on May 30, Szeftel, Elena Giorgi of Columbia University and Sergiu Klainerman of Princeton University have proved that slowly rotating Kerr black holes are indeed stable. The work is the product of a multiyear effort. The entire proof consisting of the new work, an 800-page paper by Klainerman and Szeftel from 2021, plus three background papers that established various mathematical tools totals roughly 2,100 pages in all.
The new result does indeed constitute a milestone in the mathematical development of general relativity, said Demetrios Christodoulou, a mathematician at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.
[...]
The solutions to Einsteins equations that describe a spinning black hole wont blow up, even when poked or prodded.
In 1963, the mathematician Roy Kerr found a solution to Einsteins equations that precisely described the space-time outside what we now call a rotating black hole. (The term wouldnt be coined for a few more years.) In the nearly six decades since his achievement, researchers have tried to show that these so-called Kerr black holes are stable. What that means, explained Jérémie Szeftel, a mathematician at Sorbonne University, is that if I start with something that looks like a Kerr black hole and give it a little bump by throwing some gravitational waves at it, for instance what you expect, far into the future, is that everything will settle down, and it will once again look exactly like a Kerr solution.
The opposite situation a mathematical instability would have posed a deep conundrum to theoretical physicists and would have suggested the need to modify, at some fundamental level, Einsteins theory of gravitation, said Thibault Damour, a physicist at the Institute of Advanced Scientific Studies in France.
In a 912-page paper posted online on May 30, Szeftel, Elena Giorgi of Columbia University and Sergiu Klainerman of Princeton University have proved that slowly rotating Kerr black holes are indeed stable. The work is the product of a multiyear effort. The entire proof consisting of the new work, an 800-page paper by Klainerman and Szeftel from 2021, plus three background papers that established various mathematical tools totals roughly 2,100 pages in all.
The new result does indeed constitute a milestone in the mathematical development of general relativity, said Demetrios Christodoulou, a mathematician at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.
[...]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1116 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At Long Last, Mathematical Proof That Black Holes Are Stable (Original Post)
sl8
Aug 2022
OP
There are some really smart people on this planet - we need to start listening to them.
walkingman
Aug 2022
#2
eppur_se_muova
(37,403 posts)1. "... a 912-page paper ...."
boggles the mind.
walkingman
(8,342 posts)2. There are some really smart people on this planet - we need to start listening to them.
splat
(2,326 posts)3. 912 pages of ... a foreign language. Amazing
Excerpt:
1.5. MAIN THEOREMS 41
The justification for the above decompositions has to do with the expected decay proper-
ties of the linearized components in perturbations of Kerr, with respect to ? and r. More
precisely, see (11.1.1),
∣
∣d?s?g| . min
{
r?2? ?1/2??dec , r?1? ?1??dec
}
,
∣
∣d?s?b
∣
∣ . r?1? ?1??dec ,
(1.4.5)
for a small constant ?dec > 0, where d = {?3, r?4, r?} denotes weighted derivatives, and
> 0 is a sufficiently small bootstrap constant. We note also that the curvature com-
ponents A, rB behave in the same way as ?b, while r( qP , B, A) behave like ?g. Moreover
A, B get the optimal decay in powers of r, i.e.
|A|, |B| . r?7/2??dec .