'Too greedy': mass walkout at global science journal over 'unethical' fees

[Eugene]

Source: The Observer

‘Too greedy’: mass walkout at global science journal over ‘unethical’ fees

Entire board resigns over actions of academic publisher whose profit margins outstrip even Google and Amazon

Anna Fazackerley
Sun 7 May 2023 08.00 BST
Last modified on Tue 9 May 2023 10.17 BST

More than 40 leading scientists have resigned en masse from the editorial board of a top science journal in protest at what they describe as the “greed” of publishing giant Elsevier.

The entire academic board of the journal Neuroimage, including professors from Oxford University, King’s College London and Cardiff University resigned after Elsevier refused to reduce publication charges.

Academics around the world have applauded what many hope is the start of a rebellion against the huge profit margins in academic publishing, which outstrip those made by Apple, Google and Amazon.

Neuroimage, the leading publication globally for brain-imaging research, is one of many journals that are now “open access” rather than sitting behind a subscription paywall. But its charges to authors reflect its prestige, and academics now pay over £2,700 for a research paper to be published. The former editors say this is “unethical” and bears no relation to the costs involved.

Professor Chris Chambers, head of brain stimulation at Cardiff University and one of the resigning team, said: “Elsevier preys on the academic community, claiming huge profits while adding little value to science.”

-snip-

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/may/07/too-greedy-mass-walkout-at-global-science-journal-over-unethical-fees

No-registration link: https://archive.is/IPGSD

[Maraya1969]

1. May this encourage others to do the same. I am impressed with these people

[BlueInID]

2. For-profit publishers

Many publishers of the scientific literature operate on a for-profit basis. This parasitizes the tradition that scientist provide community service through volunteer peer review. Eslevier is among the biggest offenders of the for-profit publishers - Wiley is bad as well. Actions like this walkout are good, but as long as we keep submitting to journals that use these publishers and continue to provide free peer review to them, the situation isn't likely to change.