Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(16,245 posts)
Tue Nov 14, 2023, 07:37 AM Nov 2023

Authors' response to "I Left Out the Full Truth to Get My Climate Change Paper Published"

Last edited Tue Nov 14, 2023, 09:24 AM - Edit history (1)

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03538-w

Authors reply to questionable publicity

Patrick T. Brown, Craig B. Clements, Adam K. Kochanski, Steven J. Davis, Holt Hanley & Scott J. Strenfel

An opinion essay written by one of us (P.T.B.) in The Free Press (see go.nature.com/3szinod) [excerpt posted below], and other related external commentary, has been interpreted as calling into question the results of our study ‘Climate warming increases extreme daily wildfire growth risk in California’ (P. T. Brown et al. Nature 621, 760–766; 2023). We would like to clarify that the essay was not intended to question any specific finding or conclusion reported in that study, but constitutes P.T.B’s subjective opinion on its broader utility. As co-authors of the study, none of the rest of us was aware of this perspective, nor do we share it.



============

https://www.thefp.com/p/i-overhyped-climate-change-to-get-published

I Left Out the Full Truth to Get My Climate Change Paper Published

I just got published in Nature because I stuck to a narrative I knew the editors would like. That’s not the way science should work.

By Patrick T Brown
September 5, 2023

If you’ve been reading any news about wildfires this summer—from Canada to Europe to Maui—you will surely get the impression that they are mostly the result of climate change.

[...]

I am a climate scientist. And while climate change is an important factor affecting wildfires over many parts of the world, it isn’t close to the only factor that deserves our sole focus.

So why does the press focus so intently on climate change as the root cause? Perhaps for the same reasons I just did in an academic paper about wildfires in Nature, one of the world’s most prestigious journals: it fits a simple storyline that rewards the person telling it.

The paper I just published—“Climate warming increases extreme daily wildfire growth risk in California”—focuses exclusively on how climate change has affected extreme wildfire behavior. I knew not to try to quantify key aspects other than climate change in my research because it would dilute the story that prestigious journals like Nature and its rival, Science, want to tell.

[...]

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Authors' response to "I Left Out the Full Truth to Get My Climate Change Paper Published" (Original Post) sl8 Nov 2023 OP
How to backtrack so I can get businesses to back me. Phoenix61 Nov 2023 #1
What a complete sandbagging, self-promoting, opportunistic, unethical, egotistical no-good piece of shit. FreepFryer Nov 2023 #2

Phoenix61

(17,587 posts)
1. How to backtrack so I can get businesses to back me.
Tue Nov 14, 2023, 07:56 AM
Nov 2023

“Now, as a member of a private nonprofit research center, The Breakthrough Institute, I feel much less pressure to mold my research to the preferences of prominent journal editors and the rest of the field. “

FreepFryer

(7,085 posts)
2. What a complete sandbagging, self-promoting, opportunistic, unethical, egotistical no-good piece of shit.
Tue Nov 14, 2023, 08:02 AM
Nov 2023

What a cockslit. He’s on a paper w 6 other scholars and uses the pronoun ‘We’ only once (and when he does, it is merely to spread a suggestion of shared blame without explaining how others are equally responsible for his egregious bias towards popular reception). The rest of the article is pure “I” and “me.”

What a blowhole. It’s obvious he thinks he will earn more from denialists and he’s pivoting while throwing his colleagues under the bus for what appears to be his own calculated decision to unethically shape his piece for opinion.

What a doucheknob. Modern-day academia is full of these fucking idiots… maybe they make up a significant part of the “6x more PhDs” whose competition he laments and clearly fears.

more sociopaths failing up

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Authors' response to "I L...