Science
Related: About this forumNutrient Collapse? Are Modern Foods Missing Nutrients: Science is Not Clear--but Very Suggestive
These excerpts are from a recent, lengthy, opinion article in Chemistry World discussing the possibility (bolding added). Adhering to the four paragraph posting rule makes for disjointed reading. The original article is quite coherent and covers much more.
When we think about the food we ate when we were younger, we might be inclined to say that it was tastier and healthier than what we eat today. And while we may be saying this out of a nostalgic tendency, researchers have been looking for a more scientific answer. In several papers, researchers have used food tables country-by-country compendia of historical information on the mineral composition of foods to report an apparent decline in micronutrients such as iron, vitamins and zinc in fruit and vegetables over time
In 2022, Mayer published another study comparing food in the UK with tables data, this time with three data points: 1940, 1991 and 2019. Her findings suggest an astonishing decline in nutrients since 1940, with the biggest overall reductions in sodium, iron, copper and magnesium. The government still says youre not supposed to compare this data because so much has changed in the food system. To me, that was the reason to look at it, she explains. Im first and foremost a nutritionist. I wanted to know Has consumed food changed its value?
But nutritionist Helena Trigueiro, who isnt involved in these studies, is more sceptical. As a nutritionist, obviously, its interesting to see the different studies and the different techniques they use. But I find it difficult to compare some papers where the methods are quite different, the samples are quite different, and the context is quite different.
But for all its benefits, the Green Revolution seems to have had one unwanted consequence. Comparing Green Revolution wheat varieties with older varieties, McGrath and his colleagues found that modern varieties contained fewer minerals when grown under the same conditions and side by side with older varieties. This suggests that the decline in micronutrients is not due to environmental factors, but to something happening inside the plant
https://www.chemistryworld.com/features/is-modern-food-lower-in-nutrients/4018578.article?utm_source=Live+Audience&utm_campaign=3be8fc0955-briefing-dy-20231205&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b27a691814-3be8fc0955-49942924
Truly fascinating discussion article, with no clear answers but presenting some very interesting thoughts.
Something which I thought not forcefully presented is the fact that without the Green Revolution hundreds of thousands of peopleindeed, more likely, millionswould have starved.
Whatever may, or may not be, any particular shortfalls of micronutrients in these (or in other current) food plants such deficits, if shown to be important, should be amenable to amelioration by fortification.
Lonestarblue
(11,825 posts)versus modern foods. Those foods, such as wheat and tomatoes, grown from heritage seeds has far more nutrients than the same crops grown from genetically altered seeds. Many of thodays seeds have been altered to be non-reproducing so that farmers must buy new seeds every year. They have also been genetically engineered with Roundup and probably other chemicals. US farmers use heavy chemicals on their crops for growth and weed control.
And we wonder why states such as Iowa and other farm states have high incidences of cancer.
2naSalit
(92,695 posts)I would not be surprised given that what we feed the plants we eat is not their natural food.
Woodwizard
(987 posts)I grow a lot of vegetables during the summer so much more flavor. Over the winter I grow leafy crops that are cold tolerant in the greenhouse nothing like a nice fresh salad in January in NY.