Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumA U.S. Lead Exposure Hotspots Analysis
The paper to which I'll refer in this post is this one: A U.S. Lead Exposure Hotspots Analysis Valerie G. Zartarian, Jianping Xue, Antonios G. Poulakos, Rogelio Tornero-Velez, Lindsay W. Stanek, Emily Snyder, Veronica Helms Garrison, Kathryn Egan, and Joseph G. Courtney Environmental Science & Technology 2024 58 (7), 3311-3321
The paper is open to the public, anyone can read it. I'll produce a few important excerpts on the "methods" which involves measurement of lead levels in children's blood but first produce here the telling graphic:
From the introduction:
While average blood lead levels in the U.S. have declined, millions of children and adults are still exposed to various sources of lead. (1?3) Although there are known sources of lead exposure (e.g., paint in older homes, drinking water from lead pipes, soil, and consumer products), (4) it is difficult to identify communities that may have disproportionate exposures because of limitations in childrens blood lead surveillance data and gaps in environmental and other exposure data. (5) There is no known level of lead exposure to be without risk, (6?8) and many communities are disproportionately impacted. (9,10)
Identifying and addressing remaining lead exposure risk hotspots are priorities in the United States. The Federal Lead Action Plan (10) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Lead Strategy (e.g., Goal 2, Identify Communities with High Lead Exposures and Improve Their Health Outcomes) (9) highlight the need for lead mapping as part of whole-of-government efforts to address high exposure risk locations and disparities. Data mapping can inform screening and prioritization efforts to guide interventions and deeper dive analyses (such as enhancing childrens blood lead level (BLL) surveillance data analyses and lead source apportionment analyses). These analyses can assist in efforts around primary prevention; lead-based paint mitigation; lead remediation, enforcement, education, and outreach. (11) Federal agencies are collaborating to identify geographic locations and populations at risk for lead exposure so that they can be addressed proactively. Examples include targeting HUD remediation grants, EPA environmental cleanup actions, and CDC primary prevention and enhanced blood lead testing programs for children. (5)
Identifying and addressing remaining lead exposure risk hotspots are priorities in the United States. The Federal Lead Action Plan (10) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Lead Strategy (e.g., Goal 2, Identify Communities with High Lead Exposures and Improve Their Health Outcomes) (9) highlight the need for lead mapping as part of whole-of-government efforts to address high exposure risk locations and disparities. Data mapping can inform screening and prioritization efforts to guide interventions and deeper dive analyses (such as enhancing childrens blood lead level (BLL) surveillance data analyses and lead source apportionment analyses). These analyses can assist in efforts around primary prevention; lead-based paint mitigation; lead remediation, enforcement, education, and outreach. (11) Federal agencies are collaborating to identify geographic locations and populations at risk for lead exposure so that they can be addressed proactively. Examples include targeting HUD remediation grants, EPA environmental cleanup actions, and CDC primary prevention and enhanced blood lead testing programs for children. (5)
The methods:
The general approach taken for this analysis consists of the following four steps:
1. Statistically evaluated hotspots identified with lead indices against childrens BLL surveillance data:
(a) from Michigan (MI) and Ohio (OH), using the BLL data and statistical methods described in Xue et al. (12) and Stanek et al., (13) respectively, and an expanded set of national lead indices;
(b) from matching hotspots identified using lead indices with community hotspots identified in 9 state health department public reports (listed in Zartarian et al. (5)) and quantifying the percent; a match is defined here as a community with at least one census tract identified by the lead indices in our analyses;
2. Compared existing national indices against each other and against available BLL surveillance data using sensitivity, specificity, and Cohens kappa score to determine which indices are the statistically strongest predictors of hotspots for the national-scale analysis;
3. Produced census tract-level maps for the United States that visualize the intersection and collective combination of hotspots based on the two methods discussed in Xue et al., (12) top 20 (i.e., 80th100th) percentiles and Getis-Ord Gi* (14) geospatial cluster hotspots analysis methods;
4. Conducted national-scale analyses to identify states and counties with the highest potential lead exposure risk, based on the considered indices and the number of children younger than six years old in the identified 2010 census tracts (n = 73,086 census tracts containing at least one child less than 6 years old in the 50 states)...
1. Statistically evaluated hotspots identified with lead indices against childrens BLL surveillance data:
(a) from Michigan (MI) and Ohio (OH), using the BLL data and statistical methods described in Xue et al. (12) and Stanek et al., (13) respectively, and an expanded set of national lead indices;
(b) from matching hotspots identified using lead indices with community hotspots identified in 9 state health department public reports (listed in Zartarian et al. (5)) and quantifying the percent; a match is defined here as a community with at least one census tract identified by the lead indices in our analyses;
2. Compared existing national indices against each other and against available BLL surveillance data using sensitivity, specificity, and Cohens kappa score to determine which indices are the statistically strongest predictors of hotspots for the national-scale analysis;
3. Produced census tract-level maps for the United States that visualize the intersection and collective combination of hotspots based on the two methods discussed in Xue et al., (12) top 20 (i.e., 80th100th) percentiles and Getis-Ord Gi* (14) geospatial cluster hotspots analysis methods;
4. Conducted national-scale analyses to identify states and counties with the highest potential lead exposure risk, based on the considered indices and the number of children younger than six years old in the identified 2010 census tracts (n = 73,086 census tracts containing at least one child less than 6 years old in the 50 states)...
I added the bold. "BLL" refers to "blood lead levels"
I had a rather long riff on lead exposure here:
For my 30,000th post, I'd like to thank DU for inspiring me to expand my knowledge, and of course...
Have a pleasant Sunday.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 520 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A U.S. Lead Exposure Hotspots Analysis (Original Post)
NNadir
Feb 2024
OP
Turbineguy
(38,393 posts)1. Lead poisoning
could it be the cause of trump's popularity?