Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Anthropology
Related: About this forumIndigenous Brazilians And Environmental Protection - Analysis
Indigenous people in Brazil
1 Analysis Environment
February 9, 2019 YaleGlobal Online 0 Comments
By YaleGlobal Online
Researchers document sustainable land-management practices of Brazils indigenous people that attract international support.
By Suzanne Oakdale*
Anthropological and archeological research in Brazil points to ways that indigenous Amazonians are integral to the protection of biomes or domains of nature with characteristic flora, fauna, soil and more. Such research can call into question the boundaries between the categories of nature and humanity.
Forest management is an ancient practice, and archeology has been key for showing the entanglement of the natural and human worlds. Rather than being categorized as either wild or wrecked, biomes are coming to be seen as rooted in and contingent on human actions and social configurations of the past, as described in The Social Lives of Forests, by Susanna Hecht, Kathleen Morrison and Christine Padoch. The composition of soils, rivers, flora and fauna reveal the complex relationship between humans and nature over time. Amazonians started to manage forests about 4,000 years ago, Charles Clement and other researchers wrote in 2015. Long-term occupation formed fertile Amazonian dark earth from acidic soils, explained Eduardo G. Neves and James Petersen. In some locales such as the Upper Xingu during the first half of the first millennium AD, high population sites were built and connected by roads forming lattice-like structures, the land in between managed with weirs, ponds, causeways, fields for thatch and fruit trees, according the Michael Heckenberger and others.
Many contemporary indigenous peoples in Brazil in all255 different groups comprising less than 1 percent of the Brazilian population, according to the 2010 census continue forest management with sustainable practices that attract international attention and support. The Kayapo practice of continual low-level burning favors inaja and tucumá palms and is linked to the formation of dark earth. The Kaapor encourage old-growth forest that enhances species diversity, and this practice initiated a project funded by the World Wildlife Foundation and Rios Museu do Índio in 2009 to support distribution of their forest knowledge and help fight logging. Upper Xinguans, who manage their landscape with fire and have monitored rainfall for more than 1,000 years, have a wealth of generational knowledge about current rainfall changes and conditions leading to uncontrollable fire. The Associação Rede de Sementes do Xingu with the help of the Instituto Socioambiental has enlisted Xinguans since 2007 to gather native seeds to sell for replanting of deforested areas. With indigenous lands comprising approximately one fifth of the Brazilian Amazon, these kinds of practices contribute to environmental management, explained David Nepstad in 2005.
Another body of work questioning the boundaries between nature and culture is that of Eduardo Viveiros de Castro and his students, called perspectivism. Based on his fieldwork with the Araweté and mastery of lowland ethnographies, Viveiros de Castro has put forth an influential general characterization of Amazonian thought and explains that Amerindian thought is guided by multinaturalism a mode that considers humans and animals as united by their common humanity yet with each holding different perspectives. In contrast, naturalism characterizes Western thought, a mode founded on a shared biological nature among all living things, but a division between nature and culture, with culture being the force that separates humans from animals. Western thought regards agency and creativity as belonging to humans in contrast to the more passive nature. With the aim of decolonizing thought, multinaturalism and naturalism are not simply different cultural perspectives on a shared world, but rather entirely different realities or ontologies.
More:
http://www.eurasiareview.com/09022019-indigenous-brazilians-and-environmental-protection-analysis/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 920 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post