Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(162,437 posts)
Fri Mar 31, 2023, 06:37 AM Mar 2023

Face of Egyptian man who died 35,000 years ago, brought to life by scientists

Metro Science Reporter
Friday 31 Mar 2023 6:00 am



The skeleton belonged to a subadult male, aged 17 to 20 years old (Picture: Cicero Moraes/Moacir Santos/Pen News)


Scientists have reconstructed the face of an ancient Egyptian who lived 30,000 years before the earliest Pharaoh.

The youth died some 35,000 years ago in the Nile Valley, where his skeleton was found virtually intact at the Nazlet Khater 2 site in 1980.

Decades later, it remains the only complete modern human skeleton ever found in Africa from the start of the late Stone Age.

Now scientists have brought his features to life, completing a forensic facial reconstruction of his features using his skull.

More:
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03/31/face-of-egyptian-man-who-died-35000-years-ago-brought-to-life-18533553/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Face of Egyptian man who died 35,000 years ago, brought to life by scientists (Original Post) Judi Lynn Mar 2023 OP
Glimpses of past lives are so fascinating--thanks for posting. Timeflyer Mar 2023 #1
35,000 years ago would have been paleolithic rampartc Mar 2023 #2
Light black and gray hair, black beard and brown eyebrows. Can that be a thing? TheBlackAdder Mar 2023 #3
Any genetic relationship to contemporary Egyptians? DBoon Mar 2023 #4
Interesting....to me he looks south Asian...nt mitch96 Mar 2023 #5

rampartc

(5,835 posts)
2. 35,000 years ago would have been paleolithic
Fri Mar 31, 2023, 07:51 AM
Mar 2023

i think the "late stone age" (neolithic) may start about 10,000 years ago.

as for a 17 year old being "sub adult," 17 year olds are old enough to fight in most armies and must be considered "adult" for most purposes. in his culture he was just a few years short of being a tribal elder.

but, enough quibbling, it is a great reproduction and shows clearly that the more things change, the more they stay the same.

thanks for all of your great posts, judi

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»Face of Egyptian man who ...