Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumAndrew Seidel
I've noticed that Andrew Seidel, one of the attorneys that works for the Freedom From Religion Foundation, is getting a lot more active on Facebook these days. I find myself agreeing with practically everything he posts, and that's unusual.
He said something the other day that crystallized the distinction between agnostic and atheist for me. You may already have the two terms comfortably defined, but I've still struggled a little with them, and Andrew made sense. It's quite simple, actually:
Atheism is about BELIEF
Agnosticism is about KNOWLEDGE
We truly cannot KNOW there is no God, but based on the preponderance (and lack) of evidence, I BELIEVE there is no God.
So I am both atheist and agnostic, which somehow reminds me of Jerry DeWitt's "motto" (ex-preacher turned atheist):
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)And dreamy!!
Cartoonist
(7,532 posts)There is an ark tied up to the dock. All the believers are on board. All the atheists are on dry land. The agnostics are standing at the rails trying to make up their minds as to whether or not to come ashore.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)Belief that it's gonna rain is one thing. They do, I don't. But knowledge that it's gonna rain is another thing. If you have evidence to prove it's gonna rain, I'll happily hop on the ark.
Cartoonist
(7,532 posts)I used the word ark to denote a sailing vessel, not as a flood story. The analogy was of a ship floating on a sea of make-believe vs standing on solid facts.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)it's a statement of knowledge (or lack thereof). Atheism is my lack of belief. Agnostic atheist is perfectly acceptable and how I see myself. I don't know and I also don't believe.
Tobin S.
(10,420 posts)I don't believe in any religion. Just like atheists, I think it's all a sham. I think we will be far better off as a global society as religion is slowly relinquishing it's hold on a lot of people. The thing that makes me agnostic is that I can't tell you what happens after you die. There's no evidence that any part of us survives death, but the only way anyone can find out for certain is to die. The afterlife appears highly unlikely. Nobody is reporting back to us. But I really don't know for certain.
It's a fine distinction. Many atheists would probably consider me an atheist. I call myself an agnostic.
Cartoonist
(7,532 posts)You are still on board with the religious notion of a soul. Can you be certain there are no unicorns?
Tobin S.
(10,420 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Atheist and agnostic are NOT mutually exclusive terms.
Brainstormy
(2,428 posts)The word games really piss me off.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)and winning handily. (No relation to Alec or them Baldwins, BTW). It's a shame when a beloved character turns out to be an overly religious nutjob in real life. (he was on Firefly and Chuck and I loved those shows.)
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)How the rest of the Firefly cast could stand being in the same room with him for hours on end amazes me to this day.
Yorktown
(2,884 posts)..to some degree, it's just a detail of semantics and/or of word usage.
What you really have in the atheist/agnostic crowd is a bunch of peole who say they have no evidence there is a god (in Andrew Seidel's words, don't know if there is one)
Then, among that population, you have a repartition curve of people according to their degree of belief in the likelihood of existence of some supernatural thingies (god, whatever)
I notice in people preferring to call themselves 'agnostics' a sizable proportion of people expressing thoughts like: i don't know if there is a god, but there might be forces out there that we don't know (as in supernatural forces)
People calling themselves atheists say they are agnostics, but also express a low expectation to ever see evidence of something supernatural ever being presented (that covers rather well the more eloquent ways in which Dawkins or Dillahunty express their 'beliefs')
My two cents.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Without a belief in God.
The only reason to claim you aren't an atheist is because of the negative connotations theists have forced on the word.