Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question for my fellow Vermin... (Original Post) NeoGreen Dec 2015 OP
If memory serves, the idea comes from the Magna Carta. cleanhippie Dec 2015 #1
Interestingly, it was likely a churchman who wrote it. JNelson6563 Dec 2015 #2
Ancient Rome had a version of it. onager Dec 2015 #3
I suspect it grew out of a fear of the masses and what will satisfy their sense of "justice served." Freelancer Dec 2015 #4

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
1. If memory serves, the idea comes from the Magna Carta.
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 11:38 AM
Dec 2015

But all it takes is one religious shyster to try and turn that on its head.

onager

(9,356 posts)
3. Ancient Rome had a version of it.
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 02:45 PM
Dec 2015

Also, as I remember reading somewhere - ancient Rome made the very wise decision to keep priests out of the legal system. Law had to depend on reason and evidence, not thunderbolts and goat entrails.

Another check over the power of a magistrate was provocatio. Provocatio was a primordial form of due process. It was a precursor to habeas corpus.

If any magistrate was attempting to use the powers of the state against a citizen, that citizen could appeal the decision of the magistrate to a tribune.

http://www.crystalinks.com/RomanRepublic.html

Freelancer

(2,107 posts)
4. I suspect it grew out of a fear of the masses and what will satisfy their sense of "justice served."
Sat Dec 19, 2015, 09:37 PM
Dec 2015

IMO, when what commoners thought started to matter, doing things in a way that kept them placated became a concern. The idea that the state doesn't just do things arbitrarily, but rather after deliberation and consideration, is an appealing idea to people. So, "due process" was devised to serve that perception, while also allowing the powers that be to continue to do what they always did... at least 90% of the time, anyway.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Question for my fellow Ve...