Louisiana Supreme Court: Priests Don’t Have To Report Child Abuse

[NeoGreen]

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2016/11/louisiana-supreme-court-priests-dont-have-to-report-child-abuse/

Louisiana Supreme Court: Priests Don’t Have To Report Child Abuse

November 1, 2016 by Michael Stone

The Advocate reports the original case involves a young woman who told a Baton Rouge-area Catholic priest that a longtime church parishioner was sexually abusing her when she was only 14-years-old. The priest did nothing to stop or report the alleged abuse.

The new ruling protects the priest and the church from being held accountable for failing to protect children and report child abuse. In essence, the ruling places church dogma above the law.

As always, it is the children who suffer.

Bottom line: If a priest hears about a child being abused, in confession or not, that priest has a moral obligation to do everything in their power to protect that child, including reporting the abuse to the appropriate law enforcement authorities. To do otherwise is to fail as a human being.

[HAB911]

1. This is like self-incrimination. nt

[GeorgeGist]

2. How so?

[HAB911]

3. Priests Don’t Have To Report Child Abuse

to do so would be self-incriminating, LOL

[mountain grammy]

4. I'd like to know more about the abuser..

like was he a big contributor to the church? I'm not a legal scholar, but thinking this ruling is probably correct legally, but morally? Of course not.

[Nitram]

5. No organization, religious or otjherwise, should be above the law.