Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumGo Ahead and Embrace the Word Atheist (Even If You Prefer a Different Label)
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2017/07/30/go-ahead-and-embrace-the-word-atheist-even-if-you-prefer-a-different-label/
Go Ahead and Embrace the Word Atheist (Even If You Prefer a Different Label)
July 30, 2017 by Hemant Mehta
Should you use the word atheist to describe yourself even if Humanist describes you more thoroughly or Agnostic seems more philosophically honest?
David Silverman, President of American Atheists, (obviously) says yes. But its not just for self-serving reasons.
YouTuber Alex J. OConnor (a.k.a. CosmicSkeptic) recently met Silverman and describes the conversation they had on this very topic. He also talks about how Silverman managed to convince him that the atheist label should be embraced even if people who fit the description would rather use another term.
There are no doubt atheists who believe the word carries too much stigma or who feel we shouldnt have to use the word at all (since its not like we have a-unicornists). This video rebuts those points and more.
I love the point at the end: Call yourself an atheist today, so you wont have to tomorrow.
For my part, I prefer Realist as opposed to Atheist, primarily due to the word Atheist being dependent on existence of the theist point of view, the ambiguity of just which deity(ies) is/are being discounted (everyone is an Atheist, since no-one believes in all the gods, past present or future) and the negative connotation and subtext as derived from the "A" theism.
However, I agree that from an umbrella marketing/popularization point of view, the word has value when embraced.
Oh, and another reason I don't like the word Atheism...that whole i before e / e before i difficulty (you know, spelling).
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 2319 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Go Ahead and Embrace the Word Atheist (Even If You Prefer a Different Label) (Original Post)
NeoGreen
Jul 2017
OP
Duppers
(28,247 posts)1. You've a good point!
The word Atheist is "dependent on existence of the theist point of view," thereby, in a sense, seceding ground.
However, most theists will not have a clue what the term Realist means. I often just like saying I'm an atheist as a way to say, "I think you're wrong." It's convenient for ending pushy religious conversations.
aka-chmeee
(1,170 posts)2. I absolutely embrace the word.
Realist is great, and accurate; except many if not most religious consider themselves realists. Atheist then, to me, makes it clear in which regard you are a realist.