Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(34,775 posts)
Fri Aug 29, 2014, 09:05 AM Aug 2014

Ebola, why isn't there a natural or tribal remedy for it?

I mean they have a longer history of herbal, natural, tribal medicine in Africa than anywhere else.
Where's the natural cure for this?

Wonder what the reaction would be to this in GD?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ebola, why isn't there a natural or tribal remedy for it? (Original Post) edhopper Aug 2014 OP
Looks like the only "cure" is get over it or die. Archae Aug 2014 #1
The "natural" cure for Ebola is death EvolveOrConvolve Aug 2014 #2
this appears to be a relatively new pathogen in Humans kmlisle Sep 2014 #3
Thanks edhopper Sep 2014 #4
I did mean 1918 and native healers may not be scientists but they often have botanical knowledge kmlisle Sep 2014 #5
There's a saying edhopper Sep 2014 #6
Because Big Pharma is suppressing such remedies. Orrex Sep 2014 #7
Because the oil companies bought the technology and suppressed it! Codeine Sep 2014 #8

kmlisle

(276 posts)
3. this appears to be a relatively new pathogen in Humans
Tue Sep 2, 2014, 10:51 PM
Sep 2014

So that would explain the high death rate. When a pathogen is new they tend to be deadlier until natural selection occurs in the host population leaving the survivors who were more resistant, who then reproduce and rebuild the population. Think of how the Native Americans were wiped out by TB and measles on initial contact. They had not been exposed to these diseases before and consequently there was huge loss of life. The same is true in Africa where this relatively new disease probably has not given local herbalists and healers the opportunity to learn what helps.

There is also a theory about pathogens themselves co-evolving with their hosts so they don't completely kill off their food supply. It may be that the most virulent forms die off once the disease is controlled.

There are several very good books about the epidemiology of the 1018 flu pandemic that provide parallel stories in this country to what is happening in Africa today. The two I have read are by John Barry and Laurie Garrett (this one is more generalized - not just the flu). Both highly recommended!

kmlisle

(276 posts)
5. I did mean 1918 and native healers may not be scientists but they often have botanical knowledge
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 03:11 PM
Sep 2014

that is very useful. The example that comes to mind is quinine which was used by the incas to combat malaria and is still used as a medicine for it today.

edhopper

(34,775 posts)
6. There's a saying
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 04:26 PM
Sep 2014

natural remedies that are effective are called medicine.
There is no alternative medicine, it ether proves to be effective or it doesn't.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
8. Because the oil companies bought the technology and suppressed it!
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 12:40 PM
Sep 2014

Wait, that's that other thing.

Probably Ukrainian Nazis, then. Or Mossad.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Ebola, why isn't there a ...