Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uppityperson

(115,869 posts)
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 01:23 PM Dec 2014

A paper by Maggie Simpson and Edna Krabappel was accepted by two scientific journals

http://www.vox.com/2014/12/7/7339587/simpsons-science-paper

A scientific study by Maggie Simpson, Edna Krabappel, and Kim Jong Fun has been accepted by two journals.

Of course, none of these fictional characters actually wrote the paper, titled "Fuzzy, Homogeneous Configurations." Rather, it's a nonsensical text, submitted by engineer Alex Smolyanitsky in an effort to expose a pair of scientific journals — the Journal of Computational Intelligence and Electronic Systems and the comic sans-loving Aperito Journal of NanoScience Technology.

These outlets both belong to a world of predatory journals that spam thousands of scientists, offering to publish their work — whatever it is — for a fee, without actually conducting peer review. When Smolyanitsky was contacted by them, he submitted the paper, which has a totally incoherent, science-esque text written by SCIgen, a random text generator. (Example sentence: "we removed a 8-petabyte tape drive from our peer-to-peer cluster to prove provably "fuzzy" symmetries’s influence on the work of Japanese mad scientist Karthik Lakshminarayanan.&quot

Then, he thought up the authors, along with a nonexistent affiliation ("Belford University&quot for them. "I wanted first and foremost to come up with something that gives out the fake immediately," he says. "My only regret is that the second author isn't Ralph Wiggum."...


Link to the paper
https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2522068/manuscript_Networking_Simpson.0.pdf

Link to another fine paper, this one I may actually use.
About it.
http://www.vox.com/2014/11/21/7259207/scientific-paper-scam
The actual paper
http://www.scs.stanford.edu/~dm/home/papers/remove.pdf
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A paper by Maggie Simpson and Edna Krabappel was accepted by two scientific journals (Original Post) uppityperson Dec 2014 OP
And it's NOT from the Dr. Marvin Monroe Memorial Institute for Cognitive Dissonance ?? eppur_se_muova Dec 2014 #1
Poor Ralph. Left out again. progressoid Dec 2014 #2
Love that story! (nt) LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #3
Karthik Lakshminarayanan is a quack. Orrex Dec 2014 #4
Maybe you're a quack, buck-o. Dr. Strange Jan 2015 #5
This DU member currently has you on Ignore. Orrex Jan 2015 #6

Dr. Strange

(26,000 posts)
5. Maybe you're a quack, buck-o.
Sun Jan 4, 2015, 11:32 PM
Jan 2015

... oval face ... wormhole ... etc




Let's see if this group is a little more rational and such.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»A paper by Maggie Simpson...