Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
A paper by Maggie Simpson and Edna Krabappel was accepted by two scientific journals
http://www.vox.com/2014/12/7/7339587/simpsons-science-paperA scientific study by Maggie Simpson, Edna Krabappel, and Kim Jong Fun has been accepted by two journals.
Of course, none of these fictional characters actually wrote the paper, titled "Fuzzy, Homogeneous Configurations." Rather, it's a nonsensical text, submitted by engineer Alex Smolyanitsky in an effort to expose a pair of scientific journals the Journal of Computational Intelligence and Electronic Systems and the comic sans-loving Aperito Journal of NanoScience Technology.
These outlets both belong to a world of predatory journals that spam thousands of scientists, offering to publish their work whatever it is for a fee, without actually conducting peer review. When Smolyanitsky was contacted by them, he submitted the paper, which has a totally incoherent, science-esque text written by SCIgen, a random text generator. (Example sentence: "we removed a 8-petabyte tape drive from our peer-to-peer cluster to prove provably "fuzzy" symmetriess influence on the work of Japanese mad scientist Karthik Lakshminarayanan."
Then, he thought up the authors, along with a nonexistent affiliation ("Belford University" for them. "I wanted first and foremost to come up with something that gives out the fake immediately," he says. "My only regret is that the second author isn't Ralph Wiggum."...
Of course, none of these fictional characters actually wrote the paper, titled "Fuzzy, Homogeneous Configurations." Rather, it's a nonsensical text, submitted by engineer Alex Smolyanitsky in an effort to expose a pair of scientific journals the Journal of Computational Intelligence and Electronic Systems and the comic sans-loving Aperito Journal of NanoScience Technology.
These outlets both belong to a world of predatory journals that spam thousands of scientists, offering to publish their work whatever it is for a fee, without actually conducting peer review. When Smolyanitsky was contacted by them, he submitted the paper, which has a totally incoherent, science-esque text written by SCIgen, a random text generator. (Example sentence: "we removed a 8-petabyte tape drive from our peer-to-peer cluster to prove provably "fuzzy" symmetriess influence on the work of Japanese mad scientist Karthik Lakshminarayanan."
Then, he thought up the authors, along with a nonexistent affiliation ("Belford University" for them. "I wanted first and foremost to come up with something that gives out the fake immediately," he says. "My only regret is that the second author isn't Ralph Wiggum."...
Link to the paper
https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2522068/manuscript_Networking_Simpson.0.pdf
Link to another fine paper, this one I may actually use.
About it.
http://www.vox.com/2014/11/21/7259207/scientific-paper-scam
The actual paper
http://www.scs.stanford.edu/~dm/home/papers/remove.pdf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2532 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A paper by Maggie Simpson and Edna Krabappel was accepted by two scientific journals (Original Post)
uppityperson
Dec 2014
OP
And it's NOT from the Dr. Marvin Monroe Memorial Institute for Cognitive Dissonance ??
eppur_se_muova
Dec 2014
#1
eppur_se_muova
(37,389 posts)1. And it's NOT from the Dr. Marvin Monroe Memorial Institute for Cognitive Dissonance ??
For shame !!
http://everything2.com/title/Dr.+Marvin+Monroe
progressoid
(50,743 posts)2. Poor Ralph. Left out again.
LostOne4Ever
(9,596 posts)3. Love that story! (nt)
Orrex
(64,101 posts)4. Karthik Lakshminarayanan is a quack.
Dr. Strange
(26,000 posts)5. Maybe you're a quack, buck-o.
... oval face ... wormhole ... etc
Let's see if this group is a little more rational and such.
Orrex
(64,101 posts)6. This DU member currently has you on Ignore.
Buck-o.