2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumShouldn't picking POTUS be about character
Either your character is exemplary...or it isn't.
It really is that simple.
[br][hr][br]
I didn't expect debates on the meaning of the word character; and provide this item ..for clarity's sake.
ˈkerəktər/
noun
1.
the mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual.
"running away was not in keeping with her character"
synonyms: personality, nature, disposition, temperament, temper, mentality, makeup; More
40 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Bernie's character is good | |
30 (75%) |
|
Hillary's character is good | |
5 (13%) |
|
All of the above | |
5 (13%) |
|
Laser...is a....character | |
0 (0%) |
|
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |

Vogon_Glory
(9,726 posts)Character is only a virtue to an extent. I'd sooner have a rascally, skirt chasing rogue who knows what's what than some Bible thumping Dweeb who has no idea how the world works. We saw PLENTY of the latter in the Republicans' primaries earlier this year.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Hitler did that thingy...too
The Velveteen Ocelot
(123,538 posts)At this point my primary concern is to be sure that assclown isn't allowed within a mile of the White House.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)On that particular stratagem
The Velveteen Ocelot
(123,538 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)He couldnt be in more places...but we could have
Arguing that Trump is the issue now...infers...you are resigned
The Velveteen Ocelot
(123,538 posts)did what I could to support him. There really isn't anything more I, as an individual, can do at this point to make him become the nominee. It would be great but it's not likely to happen.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)
msongs
(70,765 posts)LonePirate
(14,035 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Character means different things to different people, but policy is a little more concrete. Still open to interpretation, but not nearly as much as character, in my opinion.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Then policy is fickle
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Philosophers and religious icons have wildly different ideas as to what constitutes a "good character." Nietzsche, Lao Tzu, de Sade, Kant, etc., all hold different opinions on the subject. On paper, many of us would agree on some things, but certainly not in practice. Personally, I suspect there is no such thing as character, or lack thereof.
All policy is fickle. 100%, through and through.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)As I expected
Stallion
(6,620 posts)generally yeah but Presidents have had great strengths and usually significant weaknesses of character. But I'd agree that's a HUGE weakness for Trump
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)And he had more character than most
Though nobody is perfect
The Velveteen Ocelot
(123,538 posts)His reputation has taken on a whole lot of polish since 1963.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Wonder what he and MLK (or even Mandela) would say in their minds...of the dynamics of this day
okasha
(11,573 posts)He ran on the assertion that the US had substantially fewer ICBM's than the USSR and was therefore vulnerable in a nuclear war. And all three Kennedy brothers had zipper problems that make Bill Clinton look like a choirboy.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)I wonder what you'd say...to him...here..today
okasha
(11,573 posts)I'd say to him:
1. Thank you for instituting the space program. It was great while it lasted.
2. Fuck you to hell for not having the guts to get out of Vietnam in your first term. You didn't get the second you hoped for, and Lyndon lied us deeper and deeper into it with the Tonkin Gulf Resolution as a result.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)And I'd dare say you wouldnt be so uncouth to say FU
HRC has done much worse
Just sayin.....
okasha
(11,573 posts)He faced Kruschev down over deployment of Soviet missiles to Cuba. For the first and only time our military went to DefCon 2. He threatened war with the USSR, and they stood down.
I remember that day very well. The nuns sent us all home so that they could all meet in chapel and pray for peace. No one was fooled, though. We all knew we were going home to die with our families when the bombs began to rain out of the sky.
Yes, I'd use that language. Friends died in Vietnam, and some who survived are permanently disabled.
And no, HRC has not done worse than Vietnam. Don't try to pin Bush's war on her.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)You are willfully blind to facts and prefer fiction
Document your contentions.please .if you intend to continue
okasha
(11,573 posts)will tell you the same things. Get yourself a couple of bios of JFK; read Caro's books on LBJ.
I suspect I play better poker than you do, too.
RandySF
(72,505 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)But we only have a few days left to even dare to pose this question.
And Im expecting my bojo..come that time.
So...fret not...this will likely wither away
I don't think the super delegates are reading DU.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)of the people.
But that's not paramount
Ace Rothstein
(3,325 posts)Hillary received more of them.
840high
(17,196 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Nes't-ce pas!
LenaBaby61
(6,991 posts)Just can't let go of losing. I understand it to a point.
I remember back in 2008 when then Sen. Obama got the best of Hillary. I was not a happy camper, but once the primaries were over, and once Hillary threw all of her support behind Sen. Obama, I got squarely behind him and never looked back. I did what I could to get others to register to vote. Helped get seniors to the polls, and made sure--with the help of others--to make sure people who sent away for mail-in ballots got them, and myself, along with others, also made sure that those who needed help getting to the polls to vote on election night got there.
But like I say, some folks just can't let go . Oh well
unblock
(54,730 posts)other things matter as well, like issues, priorities, etc.
moreover, "character" is not remotely binary as you describe, especially when it comes to politics.
we could elect a saint only to find them incapable of achieving any helpful outcomes.
lbj had some tremendous accomplishments on the domestic front, and he was known for eating raw onions before close-talking to congress-critters to twist their arms. simply put, he was not a nice guy. but i'll take effective any day of the week if it's in the name of civil rights and progressive values.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Bernie most certainly has as much experience in politics as Senator Obama did
unblock
(54,730 posts)you're o.p. is trying to make potus selection all about "character", and trying to make "character" something that you either have or don't have.
i'm saying it's rather more complex than that.
now you seem to be saying it's about character and experience.
ok....
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Dodge it..or mischaracterize it...in obfuscation
Bernie is much cleaner than Hillary
Just as many years in politics
And more progressive
Much....MUCH ...less...flip floppy
unblock
(54,730 posts)you seem to be bent on seeing everything through a hillary vs. bernie lens.
i wasn't really talking about either.
you were making arguments about how to pick a president, i disagreed with your methodology, which i find highly simplistic as it ignores many other facets that are relevant to the outcomes.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)I'm Bernie or Bust
Pure and simple
okasha
(11,573 posts)than any three other presidents from 1900-present.
He was ridiculed for it..
LBJ had less character than Herbert Hoover subtracted from Calvin Coolidge. Yet he accomplished the Voting Rights Act, the Civil Rights Act, and the Great Society legislation.
Picking POTUS should be based on experience and effectiveness.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)When he was POTUS
Post Presidency there's none who have devoted themselves to humanity..more
His signing on the Troy Davis case was awe inspiring
okasha
(11,573 posts)It indicates poor policy and bad planning.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Not me
okasha
(11,573 posts)I argued that Jimmy Carter is a man of high character, but little effectiveness as President.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Up yonder ^^^^
unblock
(54,730 posts)we had moderately high inflation (by american standards, anyway) for a few years, then stamped it out by design with interest rate hikes designed to break the expectation of inflation.
that solution to the inflation problem (which arose due to the oil shocks under nixon/ford and their incompetent non-handling of the problem -- remember ford's "whip inflation now" buttons?) was engineered by carter appointed fed chair paul volcker and is widely credited with having stabilized our economy for the subsequent decades.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)And 21% interest rates on loans
It was nutz
But I adore him (and his silent buddy Holland Ware)
840high
(17,196 posts)with great respect. He has character.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Lacking the true comprehension of POWER perceived is power achieved
He was...and still is....a very nice guy
The Velveteen Ocelot
(123,538 posts)But he was a very effective president with respect to his domestic policies.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)JFK was going to be bumped off
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)And it was right next to the hash tag #mtguyisthebestestawesome
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)
mythology
(9,527 posts)There are plenty of reports of Sanders being alienating to potential allies for not meeting his definition of purity. The recent Politico report on the end of the primary season isn't exactly a flattering portrayal (not that I take that report particularly seriously by itself as people are always happy to shift blame for failure to achieve objectives onto others).
Sanders spent a lot of time and effort opposing efforts to look at the VA when the first reports of problems came out. Yes he then helped to pass the reform bill, but he got blasted by IAVA for example for his initial refusal to take action.
I find it rare that somebody actually has exemplary behavior as I would consider it. And that includes myself.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)people at some time.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)
840high
(17,196 posts)One must try...to make a difference
athena
(4,187 posts)People who think she has a bad character are believing the propaganda rather than looking with their own eyes.
For example, Tulsi Gabbard is a darling among Bernie supporters, who seem completely unfamiliar with her extreme views on Syrian refugees.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Or evidence...mens rea...scienter...her being a lawyer
Vastly experienced in White House inner dealings
Shenanigans
Etc.....
baldguy
(36,649 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)He is a gentlemen and a warrior
Who bows not...to oppressive wills
baldguy
(36,649 posts)He is neither.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)George W Bush was elected twice.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)And the Supreme Court
MADem
(135,425 posts)That agenda should be to the advancement and betterment of We, The People.
We've had plenty of very effective "characters" in the White House--and some of them weren't clean as a hound's tooth, either, in terms of their moral qualities, certainly.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)But the arguments that Hillary is more qualified...nicer
Or of better character....are disingenuous
MADem
(135,425 posts)I couldn't say if she's nicer...but who cares? We're not electing a prom queen after all...
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Thats okay...chances are its going to be your way
XRubicon
(2,241 posts)How many did Bernie get? How many did Hillary get?
OMG! many people who vote disagree with you...
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)The system ...fer sure...is far from uniform
XRubicon
(2,241 posts)and try not to drool on it.
SamKnause
(14,081 posts)Bernie has all of these attributes.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)
XRubicon
(2,241 posts)Good honest folk, like you. Not evil people, like me.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)
Miles Archer
(18,971 posts)...is that some, although maybe not all, of her supporters think her character is fine just the way it is.
People not in that category have questions / qualms / etc about her character, or they flat-out are not admirers or supporters.
That's painting it in broad strokes, of course.
There will be more than a few Democrats who will vote for her for reasons other than her "character," the biggest reason being to stop Trump. A "vote" is not synonymous with "vote of confidence" 100% of the time. Sometimes it's something you have to do in order to prevent something else from happening...in this case, preventing "President Trump."
It's like anything else in life.
It would be a large, perhaps impossible effort to convince someone who admires and respects Clinton to convince them that they shouldn't.
It would be a large, perhaps impossible effort to convince someone who neither admires not respects Clinton to convince them that they should.
And as someone who has supported Sanders, I've done that, without trying to bend or allowing myself to be bent. People who are excited about Clinton? Good for them. It's important to find people and causes that excite you. Why would I want to rain on their parade?
I don't think the 2016 election is about character at all, unless you list the negatives Trump brings to the table. Then it's about his character.
Clinton is who we have in our corner to stop him. That's the sum total of my praise for her on any level.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)1st of all...her character is an issue..for me
2nd ...the quid pro quo while Sec of State getting millions for the Foundation...from foreigners..is reprehensible
Finally...I know Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs far better than most.. Abd she tooks Sachs money...praising them...while winking an eye...telli g them to stop that
So she has received a piece of my childrens inheritance, by proxy...that they stole..by fraud and corruption
Including mayhem and worse
She will never touch Goldman Sachs
And I'll never touch her
Miles Archer
(18,971 posts)...I just don't know if I'm going to be able to vote for her in November.
I'll never be a supporter, I'll never have an "H->" avatar of Clinton photos in my sig line.
That said, she's what we've got. It will be a choice between her and Trump, unless the RNC decides to throw him under the bus at the convention, and so far they have shown themselves to be cowards who are all tough talk and nothing else.
Someone posted an old video on DU yesterday. He asks her if we should have stuck with the hunt for binLaden, rather than having gone into Iraq.
"Well, Chris, I think we can do more than one thing at a time."
That's probably what concerns me the most...that she can do "more than one thing at a time."
Am I concerned about Wall Street / Big Banks getting richer while the working class struggles? Yes.
Am I concerned about remaining in every war we are in and adding new ones? Yes.
Does she have a track record that justifies my having these concerns? Yes.
And we have three choices in November: Vote for her, vote for Trump, don't vote. I'm not including third-party candidates on this list because I don't believe they would have a chance of succeeding in this election cycle.
I can't do the second, don't feel that great about the third, and a vote for her would be a vote against my values and conscience. If it stops Trump, will my conscience feel better? No. And I have five months to decide what I'm going to do, just like the rest of us.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)A person can be of excellent character and still not suitable to be President.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)And neither Hillary...nor Trump..are certified..as of yet
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)This is an adult world.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)
pnwmom
(109,763 posts)during Bill's term, and countless dollars since then.
Few have had their character tested as much as Hillary, and the worst they can come up with is copying Colin Powell in using a private email..
Response to pnwmom (Reply #84)
Post removed
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)But now you admit that it's really about "character." Meaning that you just don't like her. I knew this was the case all along because their stated positions on the issues are not that far apart, but Sanders supporters just assume that she is always lying and pandering. It's always been about personality over the issues.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)GWB was a choir boy.
You can be a saint and still have disastrous, horrid ideas, and you can be a right prick and still have the vision and capability to do great things.