Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Yallow

(1,926 posts)
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 10:53 AM Jul 2016

What About Bush? Not One Peep About The Last Republican President's Carnage

America barely survived the last Republican President.

The entire Republican Party agrees with his insane economic policies.

We missed a huge opportunity to attack the economic terrorists and failures by pointing this out.

Trickle Down, and Tax Cuts For Corporate Outsourcers is insane, and we forgot to mention it.

Fail.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. The reason is easy- she isn't running against Bush. Got to have a clear focus on who the opponent is
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 10:55 AM
Jul 2016

unblock

(54,234 posts)
3. republicans ran against carter for years.
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 10:57 AM
Jul 2016

but then, trump presents an even juicier target.

democrattotheend

(12,011 posts)
2. Bush is not running
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jul 2016

And Clinton is hoping to appeal to some of his supporters who think Trump is crazy. There was no reason to bash him.

stopbush

(24,632 posts)
5. Bingo. Everybody knows how bad bush was as president, even the most-rabid
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jul 2016

Republicans. They just choose to lie to themselves.

Bush did sort of win two elections. To do that, he had to get millions of people to vote for him. Hillary would like some of those people to vote for her. No need to remind them that they were responsible for putting that disaster into the Oval Office...twice.

Siwsan

(27,339 posts)
4. POTUS mentioned the mess he inherited, in his speech. I think that was sufficient
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 10:58 AM
Jul 2016

We need to concentrate our energy on preventing an even more gawd awful man from entering the White House.

 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
8. Far from a fail, it's good strategy.
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 11:42 AM
Jul 2016

Not only are there more than enough more-immediate issues to go after Trump with, and Republicans in general without specifically mentioning Bush, this approach leaves the door open for a Bush endorsement of Clinton.

A Bush endorsement might be the last thing you'd personally want, but the power of such an endorsement to help rouse the country out of the denial of how dangerous and awful Trump is, and to help the country see how much better a choice Clinton is, despite the many issues that normally divide the electorate, would be amazing.

At this point I don't think that's out of the question. The Bushes are already on record as #NeverTrump. Leaving the door open for an actual Clinton endorsement by not bashing Bush is a very smart move.

jcgoldie

(12,046 posts)
9. She didn't attack Bush because she's trying to appeal to Bush republicans
Fri Jul 29, 2016, 11:53 AM
Jul 2016

Obviously the Bushes and Trump are not pals. Bush surrogates like Anna Navarro despise Trump. Why do anything to piss them off a votes a vote.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What About Bush? Not One ...