This message was self-deleted by its author

[Farmgirl1961]

This message was self-deleted by its author (Farmgirl1961) on Mon Dec 5, 2016, 12:42 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

[4139]

1. Hoax

[Farmgirl1961]

4. are you sure

It came from someone who I believe is very trustworthy. It may be possible that this person was hoaxed. I will go back and take a second look. Thank you for the head's up.

[4139]

6. Yes, it is a hoax. WashPost story on it

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/post-nation/wp/2016/11/22/the-department-of-justice-is-not-going-to-conduct-a-vote-audit-based-on-your-phoned-in-outrage/?client=safari

[politicaljunkie41910]

2. I just called the 800 number and pressed 5 and got a live person. I gave her my name and told her

I would like for the November election to be audited. She asked did I want to leave my number and I gave her my number. It was the DOJ who answered the phone and they are taking names and numbers. So do call and let them know that you want the results to be audited.

[EarlG]

3. This is not true

The Department of Justice is not going to conduct a vote audit based on your phoned-in outrage

For supporters of Hillary Clinton, the post circulating on Facebook and Reddit offers hope. The Justice Department, it claims, is “tallying calls” from people who want an audit of the 2016 election. And given the small margins that Donald Trump won by in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, a shift of about 55,000 votes is all that would be needed to change the outcome.

The problem is, it’s bogus. The Justice Department doesn’t count up calls to determine whether it should launch an investigation. And they will not initiate a national audit — or force particular states to recount their results — based on the volume of outrage they receive from voters.

“The Justice Department does not tally the number of callers to determine whether federal action is warranted,” department spokesman David Jacobs said in a statement. “Investigatory decisions are based solely on the facts and evidence as they relate to the federal statutes the department enforces.”

Suggest your edit or self-delete your post in order to avoid spreading misinformation.

See also: Snopes

[Farmgirl1961]

5. I've just sent a message to the person who provided the information for clarification

Thanks for the head's up.