= new reply since forum marked as read
Wikileaks re. the Dem. Primary were done to make Bernie supporters not vote or vote for third party during the General Election. Also, the emails did not show anything unfair to Sanders had taken place. They just showed a few lower level people had said snarky things after Hillary had wrapped up the nomination with enough votes and Bernie stayed in at the race too long. Even Bernie's campaign manager said that those emails didn't amount to much and that there was plenty of snark in the Sanders campaign's emails in the heat of the primary battle.
It is odd that someone on DU is fixated on the Trump campaigns talking points (Trump and his shills certainly spent plenty of time trying to poison the minds of Bernie supporters against Hillary), instead of being concerned about the fact that we have a president elect who is Putin's puppet and was elected with lots of help from Putin, Comey, etc.
... when he had is people work against Hillary the general election because he thought "he had interfered in his election in 2011". "So much blame to go around"? That's past sick!!!
The only thing Hillary did to "interfere in Putin election" was to point out what most international observers of the Russian 2011 were saying - that Putin had rigged the election - which he certainly had.
This is what the Putin calls interference - from The Daily Caller
In December 2011, Russian Prime Minister Vladamir Putin criticized then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for interfering in Russian elections after she demanded an investigation of whether Putin’s party had rigged the parliamentary elections, thereby denying the voices of the voters.
“Russian voters deserve a full investigation of electoral fraud and manipulation,” Clinton declared in early December of that year. “Regardless of where you live, citizenship requires holding your government accountable,” she said later.
Clinton also argued that rigged elections prevent the people from having their voices heard.
“The Russian people, like people everywhere, deserve the right to have their voices heard and their votes counted,” Clinton said while in Germany. (Independent election monitors, it’s worth noting, reported widespread ballot stuffing by pro-Putin actors.)
http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/25/dec-2011-hillary-clinton-angers-putin-demands-investigation-into-russian-electoral-fraud/
So Putin and his buddy rig the Russian elections and when someone call them on it and you insinuate that it's okay for them to try to rig our election in favor of Trump as well. Yea, I can see why you might think Hillary got what she deserved. 
.... Which reads as follows:
I saw on another post that Putin was retaliating against Clinton because he thought she had interfered in his election in 2011. So much blame to go around and it seems to be growing and never ending.
And you apparently can't understand why I might comment on on your statement (above) by saying, "You seem to be insinuating that Putin was justified when he had is people work against Hillary the general election because he thought 'he had interfered in his election in 2011". 'So much blame to go around"?
Apparently you either were insinuating that Hillary brought the Russians hacks on herself or you have trouble understanding how other people will react to your posts. Either way you need to think before you post. 
I agree with your premise. 
A foolish consistency is indeed, the hobgoblin of little minds.
Two different forms of activity, two different post analyses, two different pre-analyses, three different players, two different levels of voting, etc. But other than that, they're precisely the same, regardless of your psychic pretenses... 
