Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RoccoR2

(90 posts)
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 09:36 PM Dec 2016

CNN letting go (firing) Donna Brazile a week before the Election

Gave credibility & authenticity to the hacked email issue. As if CNN said 'yes it is a scandal'

I learned this over the weekend -- at least it did to my aunt and her 2 children (voting age)

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Hekate

(94,717 posts)
1. Of course it did. But they kept Lewandowski, who was definitely serving 2 masters....
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 09:46 PM
Dec 2016

I'd love to know if he was receiving two full salaries, or just was on retainer for Trump during that time.

So in my opinion, Brazile's firing was as bogus as it gets.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
3. Brazile passed on primary debate questions that CNN was going to ask to the Clinton campaign.
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 09:48 PM
Dec 2016

She should have been canned at the DNC as well....

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
5. We should have realized that Lewandowski's "firing" by the campaign was a cover story.
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 11:37 PM
Dec 2016

That was clearly nothing but a ploy to infiltrate him into CNN.

brush

(57,615 posts)
2. Credbility? How so? We knew by then Assange via Putin was hacking Podesta and the DNC.
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 09:47 PM
Dec 2016

Donna Brazile, by the way, said of course she told Hillary what she knew. And as a long-time activist would do it again — but in person or text next time.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
4. It was a scandal.
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 10:58 PM
Dec 2016

She gave debate questions to a campaign in advance, and that campaign didn't report that fact to the debate hosts. Had she not given the questions, or had the campaign reported her actions, there wouldn't have been a problem. All necessary asses would be properly covered.

This is one reason why we're supposed to always maintain ethics, even when we think nobody is looking.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»CNN letting go (firing) D...