Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

wellst0nev0ter

(7,509 posts)
Tue Dec 13, 2016, 07:03 PM Dec 2016

Whites lost 700,000 jobs over past nine years

At least according to this article:

There are almost nine million more jobs than there were at the previous peak in November 2007, just before the economy tumbled into recession. But the gains have not been evenly distributed.

Despite accounting for less than 15 percent of the labor force, Hispanics got more than half of the net additional jobs. Blacks and Asians also gained millions more jobs than they lost. But whites, who account for 78 percent of the labor force, lost more than 700,000 net jobs over the nine years.

The racial and ethnic divide is starker among workers in their prime. Whites ages 25 to 54 lost some 6.5 million jobs more than they gained over the period. Hispanics in their prime, by contrast, gained some three million jobs net, Asians 1.5 million and blacks one million.


[img][/img]

So is this why whites voted overwhelmingly for Cheeto Benito, because they were actually losing jobs to minorities?
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

David__77

(23,870 posts)
1. Do you interpret this data as meaning whites lost jobs to minorities?
Tue Dec 13, 2016, 07:13 PM
Dec 2016

If a white labor force entrant and a non-white labor force entrant apply for a newly-created job, and the non-white individual gets the job, did the white employment candidate lose the job to a minority? I don't think so. I don't interpret this data as meaning that whites lost jobs to minorities.

 

wellst0nev0ter

(7,509 posts)
3. But apparently they did not get a net gain from the job growth
Tue Dec 13, 2016, 07:17 PM
Dec 2016

Plus apparently those jobs are mostly service work and located in urban areas, so we can see why the white working class might be unsatisfied with the results.

David__77

(23,870 posts)
4. Isn't this, at least in part, a function of demographic change?
Tue Dec 13, 2016, 07:22 PM
Dec 2016

Every year people leave the labor market (due to age or other reasons), and people enter the labor market (coming of age or other reasons). I suppose that the composition of labor market entrants is less white than the composition of those leaving the labor labor market, if only because younger people may be more non-white than older people. I think that more useful metrics might be unemployment rate rather than the absolute number of jobs.

WhiteTara

(30,172 posts)
2. I used to own a factory and employed
Tue Dec 13, 2016, 07:14 PM
Dec 2016

about 30 people. I had white and POC workers. If we ever needed overtime, the POC hands would wave and the white faces would be down in the table. I found POC had greater interest in the success of the company and we worked hard to compensate the people who created the wealth of our company.

 

TheFrenchRazor

(2,116 posts)
6. the racial breakdown matters less than the fact that most new jobs suck. one person can't live
Tue Dec 13, 2016, 08:24 PM
Dec 2016

live on the money these jobs pay, much less a family. this has been going on for decades of coursem, but it is hitting critical mass now.

stillcool

(32,784 posts)
7. poor whites in rural areas...
Tue Dec 13, 2016, 08:56 PM
Dec 2016

vs. minorities in urban areas ...and most new jobs are in the service industry. I guess there's just not enough McDonalds and Walmarts...in rural areas.

JustinL

(722 posts)
10. there is a fatal flaw in this analysis: it takes no account of changing demographics
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 04:11 PM
Dec 2016

According to the Census Bureau's American Community Survey, the total number of non-Hispanic whites aged 25-54 decreased by 6.6 million from 2007 to 2015. In that same age group, during the same time period, the number of Hispanics increased by 4 million, and the number of blacks increased by 900 thousand.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Whites lost 700,000 jobs ...