Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(103,484 posts)
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 12:57 PM Dec 2016

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (Omaha Steve) on Thu Dec 15, 2016, 12:12 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) Omaha Steve Dec 2016 OP
Guess this is jehop61 Dec 2016 #1
No one is excusing Russia here. TeacherB87 Dec 2016 #2
So I guess since yesterday, MSM bias, dark money, vote suppression and sexism were all solved? Orsino Dec 2016 #4
Find someone arguing that point. TeacherB87 Dec 2016 #8
Condesending tripe from a RW source? Seriously Steve, you're embarrassing yourself. bettyellen Dec 2016 #3
Nah Omaha Steve Dec 2016 #6
no, it's not simply facts CreekDog Dec 2016 #9
Again with the ad hominem attacks TeacherB87 Dec 2016 #10
Recommended, with reservations. guillaumeb Dec 2016 #5
Commentary Magazine? CreekDog Dec 2016 #7

jehop61

(1,735 posts)
1. Guess this is
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 12:59 PM
Dec 2016

One way to excuse Russia's interference. Pretty much B.S. And right wing theory. Who wrote this RT?

 

TeacherB87

(249 posts)
2. No one is excusing Russia here.
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:05 PM
Dec 2016

And not that the site is right wing or anything, but ad hominem attacks on a source are not sufficient to discount the validity of what they're saying. That's just an intellectually lazy way to dismiss someone without having to provide a counterpoint.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
4. So I guess since yesterday, MSM bias, dark money, vote suppression and sexism were all solved?
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:08 PM
Dec 2016

It's really cool that all those excuses have now vanished. When are we re-voting?

I gotta pay attention to the news more.

 

TeacherB87

(249 posts)
8. Find someone arguing that point.
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:10 PM
Dec 2016

Because it isn't me.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
3. Condesending tripe from a RW source? Seriously Steve, you're embarrassing yourself.
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:06 PM
Dec 2016

Omaha Steve

(103,484 posts)
6. Nah
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:08 PM
Dec 2016

Facts R hard to fight. What is in there that didn't happen? When did the Jewish press go RW?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
9. no, it's not simply facts
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:11 PM
Dec 2016

but hey, let us know if you think we should use Commentary Magazine for all our facts.

 

TeacherB87

(249 posts)
10. Again with the ad hominem attacks
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:12 PM
Dec 2016

If I didn't know better, I'd assume people that agree with the point you just made have nothing substantial to say in defense of your opinions.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
5. Recommended, with reservations.
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:08 PM
Dec 2016

While we can debate, or possibly agree on who we feel would have been the better candidate, the very real GOP strategies to depress and suppress the vote cannot be ignored. If Democrats do not recognize that the GOP has engaged in voter suppression, and will continue to engage in it, we run the risk of many more of these very close elections that just happen to result in a close GOP win on the state and national level.

And agreed there was far too much talk of a blue wall, and far too much lack of attention to the ground game in these states, but Greg Palast's reporting on machine malfunction and spoiled ballots being concentrated in minority areas cannot be coincidental.

Unfortunately the US corporate media will not question the integrity of the voting process because that would be too much like actual investigative reporting and would call into question the GOP's motivations and tactics.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
7. Commentary Magazine?
Thu Dec 15, 2016, 01:09 PM
Dec 2016

I hope this isn't your go-to source for information on Democrats and Hillary.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This message was self-del...