This was posted yesterday on DU, (link at bottom), which presented the disingenuous,

[still_one]

Last edited Fri Dec 23, 2016, 05:26 PM - Edit history (2)

tweet from Jill Stein, along with her questionable associations celebrating Putin's media enterprise Russia Today from the December 2015 event.



One has to wonder why she is so anxious to dismiss Russian interference in our election

Here is the OP from DU yesterday which presented this, along with a tweet from Ms. Stein defending the Russians:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=8393974

...

[Ohioblue22]

1. How come dems were foolish enough to vote for her

[still_one]

3. because people are guidable. Not that much different than some of those who voted for trump

[MichMan]

2. How come so many suckers were so eager to donate $$$ n/t

Last edited Fri Dec 23, 2016, 03:00 PM - Edit history (1)

[still_one]

4. Because they want to believe they can reverse the election results

[msongs]

5. obama sat at the same table as putin multiple times nt

[still_one]

6. Honoring Russia TV? NOPE

[La Lioness Priyanka]

14. but obama is not on twitter calling news about russian hacks fake

Dr. Jill Stein ?@DrJillStein Dec 16
We still don't see evidence—just proclamations. #FakeNews

[still_one]

18. I didn't word the OP well at all. I was actually referring to a DU post

from yesterday regarding a tweet from Jill Stein, which you have kindly pointed out.

I have hopefully reworded the OP so it is not as ambiguous

Thanks

[La Lioness Priyanka]

19. yeah, i knew what you were talking about

cos i read the same tweet

[still_one]

20. Thanks again

[Cha]

23. President Obama is President of the United States

of America and he did so in that capacity.

[Hekate]

30. You must be joking. Obama is POTUS, not a Putin apologist promoting a propaganda organ.

[jodymarie aimee]

7. very very OLD news

everyone knows this.

[La Lioness Priyanka]

13. yeah but her defense of putin on twitter just happened

[still_one]

15. You misunderstood the post. I was referring to the link that was posted yesterday on DU

that Ms. Stein felt so motivated to rush to the defense of Russia with a tweet.

I will make the OP clear


Thanks

[Cha]

25. Yesterday is not so old.. as it says in the OP.. he's linking the two events.

Jill Stein: There's no evidence that Russia tried to help Trump win



http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=8393974

[SharonClark]

8. Reported yesterday???

It was all over this site months ago. What is your point in posting this?

[La Lioness Priyanka]

12. because she is on twitter stating that Russians did hack

with #fakenews

This is what she wrote:

We still don't see evidence—just proclamations. #FakeNews

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-blames-putins-personal-grudge-against-her-for-election-interference/2016/12/16/12f36250-c3be-11e6-8422-eac61c0ef74d_story.html?utm_term=.48b0dccaf7c0

[still_one]

16. I wasn't referring to the picture, but a DU post yesterday of a Jill Stein tweet

I will reword the OP so there is no ambiguity

thanks

[Cha]

24. To link the two events.. pic and the Tweet standing up for Russia

as not the "HACKER" Yesterday.

Jill Stein: There's no evidence that Russia tried to help Trump win



http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=8393974

Not so old.. yesterday.

[milestogo]

9. Have you never had dinner with an asshole?

[Pathwalker]

10. Yes, but in my defense, he was my relative.

So, there's that.

[La Lioness Priyanka]

11. yes, but then if the CIA and 17 other institutions reported that asshole had done something

assholish, i would not be on twitter calling it #fakenews

[uponit7771]

28. +1

[still_one]

17. It was the occasion of honoring Putin's media network Russia Today. She was there to

Putin and his news network

This was no accident, but a willful decision to celebrate Russia Today

[Cha]

26. Not to celebrate the opening of a russian propaganda station.

[True_Blue]

22. You must mean the republicans

Because it wasn't the Democrats who claimed there was WMD in Iraq.

[uponit7771]

29. Umm no good try at rwtp ... That was Tenet and not Intel agencies

[jfern]

31. No, really a lot was from the CIA

If Democrats suddenly trust everything the CIA says, they're idiots. The CIA is no friend of democracy.

[uponit7771]

32. No it wasn't, again... another RWTP... Pelosi already tweeted that out the "slam dunk" came from

... Tenent and not the intel agencies. W and Cheney had their own consolidation arm called the SOP or SPO or whatever to funnel intel to them...

The CIA included the caveats that the Bush admin kindly left out of telling the American people

[Cha]

27. You ask and excellent question, stillone.. Why, indeed? Does

she not know how ******* obvious she is and wrong.. evidently not caring as long as a certain someone sees she's standing up for them?