Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 04:29 PM Dec 2016

There is something important I have learnt from this election

and that is that policies directed specifically toward the very poor, backfire.

Not sure if you guys read the Sarah Kliff's Obamacare piece, and it seems that the middle/lower middle class consistently feels that the poor have gotten in better (not least because of race).

Other articles have also pointed out why some people are voting against their better economic interest and it boils down to this, we think that the middle and lower middle class will get upset with the 1% but really they get mad about people poorer than them getting 'free' things

http://www.vox.com/2016/12/13/13920916/woman-obamacare-explains-why-voted-trump-repeal-change

Going forward democrats need to address this. Our theory of the case is that the working class should be mad at the 1%, whereas the reality is that the working class is mad at those they think are the lazy poor, getting rich off medicare and food stamps.

I want to add this caveat: I think it's wholly immoral not to support the poor, but it seems in order to support the poor we have to ensure that other classes of people get equal amounts of 'free stuff'.


23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There is something important I have learnt from this election (Original Post) La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 OP
All about the framing: guillaumeb Dec 2016 #1
yup La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #4
Which is why higher taxes on the middle class will never fly. JHan Dec 2016 #2
yup. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #3
When I defend aid to the disadvantaged... orwell Dec 2016 #5
also, when people are racist, they are not generous to other races La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #8
Like addressing all the free things the top 1/10th of 1% get LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #6
That is why Social Security is structured the way it is. nt tblue37 Dec 2016 #7
and medicare for all seniors too.. nt La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #9
Winner, right here. kcr Dec 2016 #19
R's have always behaved this way toward the poor. PotatoChip Dec 2016 #10
it's not just republicans. read the vox article La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #11
Bull. PotatoChip Dec 2016 #12
ok then. nt La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #13
It was an amazing look into the "minds" of mcar Dec 2016 #14
yup La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #15
I agree, LLP. brer cat Dec 2016 #16
all of it sickens me. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #17
The stronger baby bird pushes the weaker one from the nest to die... ymetca Dec 2016 #18
we worked with the insurance companies and had to screw some people in the 99% to help others. JCanete Dec 2016 #20
This was Reagan's doing and it continues andym Dec 2016 #21
the solution is to expand aid programs to be available to all Amishman Dec 2016 #22
the racism is too strong JI7 Dec 2016 #23

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
1. All about the framing:
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 04:34 PM
Dec 2016

To a white conservative, everything that he/she receives is an earned benefit. Everything a non-white gets is welfare.

orwell

(7,961 posts)
5. When I defend aid to the disadvantaged...
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 04:39 PM
Dec 2016

...I hear this comment a lot.

It's not just framing, there is a real palpable anger about this.

When I point out to people that aid represents a small portion of the budget it falls on deaf ears.

When people feel that they are hurting, they do not feel generous...

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
8. also, when people are racist, they are not generous to other races
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 04:47 PM
Dec 2016

who they perceive benefit more than them

no one talks about how FDR purposefully excluded blacks, to pass massive welfare state programs.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
6. Like addressing all the free things the top 1/10th of 1% get
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 04:40 PM
Dec 2016

They only pay partial ss taxes.

Loopholes.

write offs.

etc

kcr

(15,522 posts)
19. Winner, right here.
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 01:24 PM
Dec 2016

That is exactly why you don't means test. You don't have resentment issues and there's a solid safety net safely in place.

mcar

(43,518 posts)
14. It was an amazing look into the "minds" of
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 05:02 PM
Dec 2016

people who regularly and willingly vote against their own interests.

brer cat

(26,291 posts)
16. I agree, LLP.
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 05:38 PM
Dec 2016

The absolute worst ones to me are those who would deny food and healthcare to infants and children because they think the parents don't deserve it. WTF!? Beyond the fact that they don't know the parents and are therefore making shit up, do they really think children should be punished for their parents' failings?

ymetca

(1,182 posts)
18. The stronger baby bird pushes the weaker one from the nest to die...
Fri Dec 23, 2016, 05:47 PM
Dec 2016

You'd think we humans would be more evolved, more "humane" than that, but it's been a long, long, climb.

I try to tell my conservative friends that their boss doesn't just live in a bigger, nicer house anymore --the one they see behind gated walls in a luxurious neighborhood, with perfectly smooth asphalt roads, with lawns ever green, and water fountains a-billowing even in the dead of winter (their heated!). No, that turreted mansion is only one of dozens they own all over the world, along with yachts with built-in heliports, and fleets of private jets.

My conservative friends can't seem to wrap their heads around the fact that if 99% of the population was completely on welfare, the entirety of that money would not add up to what a handful of plutocrats have. They can't comprehend it. They cannot understand that there is nothing anyone anywhere on Earth could ever do to "earn" that much money. They still think that brass ring could've been in reach if only they worked harder, or were smarter, more beautiful, talented, or just plain lucky.

When I tell them that their boss probably has a "peasant policy" on them, and will even benefit from their death, they just look at me dumbly, faces ashen, crestfallen.

Then they go out and buy more guns.


 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
20. we worked with the insurance companies and had to screw some people in the 99% to help others.
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 02:37 PM
Dec 2016

That's the problem.

They get mad at the poor because the Democrats have done a shitty job of taking up class warfare. Sanders was popular and is, for a message that did champion that.

As a lone voice in the wilderness, would he have ever be able to achieve more than the success he got? Not enough probably, but if the whole democratic party stopped playing nice with corporations that would amplified.

It isn't about whether people want to shit on the poor more than take from the rich, its that they are greatly confused about who it is that is actually fucking them, and that is the corporate media's fault first and foremost, along with the expiration of the fairness doctrine that Bill Clinton can at least own in part, and Democrats fault second, because they have accepted the mantle as the less corporate party for the last 30 years.

andym

(5,689 posts)
21. This was Reagan's doing and it continues
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 03:15 PM
Dec 2016

He explicitly played up the idea of the undeserving poor taking money from the middle class and it was worked very well for the GOP ever since. Lower taxes and less government is their mantra. Pay for the tax cuts by cutting money for the poor is their solution. That is one reason why so many are against the federal government helping the poor. It is one reason that the GOP is doing so well in rural areas who somehow feel it is the poor in the cities that are taking more of the money. It is one reason beyond gerrymandering why the GOP controls 2/3 of the statehouses.

Amishman

(5,816 posts)
22. the solution is to expand aid programs to be available to all
Sat Dec 24, 2016, 03:55 PM
Dec 2016

expand foodstamps/SNAP to be available to everyone who wants it. X $ per adult, Y $ per child. No eligibility requirements.

Maybe adjust it a little bit to stop people from using it for soda/junk food.

Pay for it by reducing military spending or a transaction tax on wallstreet. Or up the tax on the top 1%.

JI7

(90,547 posts)
23. the racism is too strong
Mon Dec 26, 2016, 12:05 AM
Dec 2016

the thing about this video is that it's not just that one woman but it looks like there are others who agree with her. and NOBODY defending the hispanic women being attacked by her. AND i have watched various links to this video and articles with comments sections and there are wayyy to many claiming this has nothing to do with racism. that the woman was upset over line cutting. so they ignore all the bigoted crap she is spewing and try to claim it has nothing to do with that.

and the line cutting is bs also since they were already in the line and being helped. one woman just left to get a couple other things to add on to the other items being checked out. this happens all the time. it shouldn't get any reaction other than some groans over having to wait a few seconds longer.


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»There is something import...