2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPoll: Bernie vs. Hillary on Social Justice
Regarding their actual track records, when it comes to championing social justice...
Please rec this thread if you'd like to see lots of votes.
105 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Hillary has a much stronger record | |
2 (2%) |
|
Hillary has a somewhat stronger record | |
0 (0%) |
|
About the same | |
4 (4%) |
|
Bernie has a somewhat stronger record | |
0 (0%) |
|
Bernie has a much stronger record | |
99 (94%) |
|
Other (please state below) | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
99Forever
(14,524 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Pushing policy on global human rights. Helping to uplift oppressed and poverty stricken women and children around the globe. Etc etc. etc.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She was fiercely opposed to same sex marriage just a few short years ago.
While she marched in pride parades.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Listing off some of her accomplishments in global social justice. I didn't realize you were just here to air grievances. Yes, it appears she's evolved on this issue. Good for her.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)HC supporters love to forget all about how she fought so hard to keep one minority group from having equal rights.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Which is why it wasn't listed.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Weird that you "forgot" about that chapter in her life.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)This is boring.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)13. I wouldn't consider that an "accomplishment"...
Which is why it wasn't listed."
Which is it?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Somehow negates a life of global humanitarianism.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Just because you would rather forget that period in her life doesn't mean everyone else forgot about it.
And a few speeches don't equal "a life of global humanitarianism".
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Every time you're presented with an uncomfortable truth you post that insipid statement.
It's like your own personal white flag.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)I don't have to defend her every decision. I know that must be an uncomfortable truth for you.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)mr blur
(7,753 posts)Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)And don't try to make it too difficult on those who are not in the Hillary camp right now.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Why do you ask?
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)three strikes, ending welfare and escalation of war on drugs in '90s. Bernie opposed all that.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Bernie's record is stellar, no doubt about it. And HC has a lot of explaining to do.
artislife
(9,497 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)for the Democratic nomination in 2008. Had she been elected she would have been a president who opposed equal rights for lgbt people.
She finally came around in 2013.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/04/16/hillary-clintons-changing-views-on-gay-marriage/
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Which have teams around the globe.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)it's a singular, driving focal point in that person's life. Jane Goodall devoted her life to understanding great apes. Stephen Hawking has devoted his life to exploring and understanding physics. Adam Sandler has devoted his life to being a gigantic fucking asshole.
Clinton has certainly pitched in to the AIDS effort in Africa and I won't knock that. But to say say she's "dedicated her life" to it is more than a little hyperbolic. I mean she's not exactly out in the field doing this, and it's not the keystone of her life..
"Adam Sandler has devoted his life to being a gigantic fucking asshole."
/OT
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Have you researched how non profit agencies work? Hint: people get payed, sometimes very well.
I'm not going to walk you through it. I'm sure as smart as you are that, very little can contribute to the over all campaign once everyone gets paid.
please don't play dumb.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)You don't get to pick and choose what counts and what doesn't.
Take a gander at the poll results. Seeing a trend yet?
Bwahahahahahahahaha.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Have you seen the actual poll results, you know, the ones done by professional pollsters?
bvf
(6,604 posts)Since you refer to them as "the actual poll results," you must have an actual poll in mind directed specifically to the social justice question.
Link? Or did you just make that up?
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)London Lover Man
(371 posts)She supported that, starting with her husband's 1994 legislation.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)And its pretty funny how you guys think politicians casting a few insignificant votes in office is somehow even in the same league as someone who has worked on global humanitarianism and social justice. Please, get a grip.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)On many occasions.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Are you new at this?
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)You'll need to try a bit harder
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I'm sure she's done good work there, but no, a person who was First Lady, the Senator, the Secretary of State--that person must dedicate their lives to those positions.
eridani
(51,907 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)It says so right up there.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)They are almost all non-scientific... or omit certain groups... or only count people that meet specific criteria... etc.
I think if they were scientific, they'd be less likely to make sales.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)"One Finger ... Courageously Moistened ... Held Aloft ... Ascertaining the Winds ... "
We expect a comment soon, once the focus group results come in.
Haven't you heard? We must discount the last 50 years of track record and focus only on what's happened in the last six months. The support of various hashtags hangs in the balance.
George II
(67,782 posts)Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)A modern politician having taken a 50-year unpopular-yet-principled stand is probably unique. Ignore that. Focus on that 20+ year gap though - there couldn't possibly be gaps in the records of other candidates.
If only he'd been a Goldwater girl, or not known which way to go on LGBT rights a mere few years ago. If only the same focus-grouped precision of today could have been applied when establishing principles held (or changed) for the previously-mentioned 50 years ...
Taking the opponent's strength (50 yr track record) and portraying it as a weakness - where have I heard that strategy before?
kenn3d
(486 posts)Excerpted from another Black blogger's piece entitled:
BERNIE SANDERS FOR PRESIDENT
A good read with more interesting perspectives in the comments
http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/bernie-sanders-president-19734
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)Your ability to sense aligning perspectives is quite keen.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)focusing on different areas and during different periods and through different methods.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)as to your arguments here? They seem to see things differently than you do.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the likely fact is, with history and a respect for the past serving as a guide, neither Bernie or HRC or O'Malley will do much of anything for Black people (except for, maybe, as an resultant of some other policy, e.g., universal day-care will benefit all working class folks including Black folks, as opposed to targeted grants to finance Black-owned businesses or an increase in federal "set-asides"/sub-contracting requirements for Black businesses). All I hope for, in this and every election of my life, is that the eventual president will not work against Black folks' interest.
Now ... Both (all three) candidates have, largely, cast "the right" votes on civil rights/social justice legislation ... that's the easy part; though, I doubt any of the candidates will "waste" the political capital to do anything bold with respect to social justice.
delrem
(9,688 posts)was written by Anthony Kennedy, who was appointed by Ronald Reagan?
That surprised me.
Given who appointed the man Supreme Court Justice, his ruling on Citizens United v. FEC was more his style. I reconcile the opposites by judging that Anthony Kennedy "evolved" on the marriage equality issue, because he "evolved" in his understanding of sexual identity, by which I mean that he gained greater depth of understanding of what sexual identity *is*, then applied that greater understanding to the laws that he was ruling on. Whatever else I might think about the man Anthony Kennedy, I applaud that kind of evolution in thought and signals a global change in way of thinking of and perceiving other people, and I don't think it ever should be disparaged. Because it's real.
Anyhoo... my point is that Kennedy's "evolution" was slow, very slow, and it was accomplished by an unity of purpose or solidarity of purpose among a whole range of people with diverse political views -- it wasn't achieved by everyone pissing all over everyone else in a purity contest (or primary contest), it was achieved by changing the majority view of the US citizenry, by taking control of the language of debate.
Good wishes.
one is doing a better job of reaching out to others though which has been the point you and others have made. but people want to turn it into something else.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Glad to see the smoke and mirrors aren't working here.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I can't imagine why they would do that. Very strange and all that.
Props to those that showed up though, at least you'll say what you think.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Not sure why they wouldn't be proud to say what they are saying elsewhere- maybe they are too in awe of Third Way Manny
DanTex
(20,709 posts)We thought you would never come to this conclusion.
JI7
(91,161 posts)Buzz cook
(2,655 posts)Why not link to their respective voting records?
Like this.
https://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/55463/hillary-clinton#.Va8cqGMXLc8
http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/27110/bernie-sanders#.Va8dvWMXLc8
Or this.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/hillary_clinton/300022
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bernard_sanders/400357
Ya see it's easy to do.
PatrickforO
(15,143 posts)that reportedly 85% of the people on DU are pro-Bernie.
That said, think how encouraging it will be for us when outside polls begin to reflect this support.
BlueMTexpat
(15,515 posts)record in the US Congress if one combines both his House and Senate years, his votes and Hillary's votes on social justice issues are generally closer than not.
If individuals are truly interested in exploring those issues and getting information instead of piling on Clinton supporters as I noticed has happened here, please see the post upthread that lists their actual voting records. Please also check out this site: http://www.ontheissues.org/Issues.htm
Hillary actually showed great consciousness of social justice issues dating from her commencement speech at Wellesley College in 1969. Yes, 1969! http://www.sojust.net/speeches/hillaryclinton_commencement.html
Some excerpts:
We are, all of us, exploring a world that none of us even understands and attempting to create within that uncertainty. But there are some things we feel, feelings that our prevailing, acquisitive, and competitive corporate life, including tragically the universities, is not the way of life for us. We're searching for more immediate, ecstatic and penetrating mode of living. And so our questions, our questions about our institutions, about our colleges, about our churches, about our government continue.
...
Every protest, every dissent, whether it's an individual academic paper, Founder's parking lot demonstration, is unabashedly an attempt to forge an identity in this particular age. That attempt at forging for many of us over the past four years has meant coming to terms with our humanness. Within the context of a society that we perceive -- now we can talk about reality, and I would like to talk about reality sometime, authentic reality, inauthentic reality, and what we have to accept of what we see -- but our perception of it is that it hovers often between the possibility of disaster and the potentiality for imaginatively responding to men's needs. There's a very strange conservative strain that goes through a lot of New Left, collegiate protests that I find very intriguing because it harkens back to a lot of the old virtues, to the fulfillment of original ideas. And it's also a very unique American experience. It's such a great adventure. If the experiment in human living doesn't work in this country, in this age, it's not going to work anywhere.
But we also know that to be educated, the goal of it must be human liberation. A liberation enabling each of us to fulfill our capacity so as to be free to create within and around ourselves. To be educated to freedom must be evidenced in action, and here again is where we ask ourselves, as we have asked our parents and our teachers, questions about integrity, trust, and respect. Those three words mean different things to all of us.
...
There's that mutuality of respect between people where you don't see people as percentage points. Where you don't manipulate people. Where you're not interested in social engineering for people. The struggle for an integrated life existing in an atmosphere of communal trust and respect is one with desperately important political and social consequences. And the word "consequences" of course catapults us into the future. One of the most tragic things that happened yesterday, a beautiful day, was that I was talking to woman who said that she wouldn't want to be me for anything in the world. She wouldn't want to live today and look ahead to what it is she sees because she's afraid. Fear is always with us but we just don't have time for it. Not now.
...
She concludes with a wonderful poem by Nancy Schneibner:
My entrance into the world of so-called "social problems"
Must be with quiet laughter, or not at all.
The hollow men of anger and bitterness
The bountiful ladies of righteous degradation
All must be left to a bygone age.
And the purpose of history is to provide a receptacle
For all those myths and oddments
Which oddly we have acquired
And from which we would become unburdened
To create a newer world
To transform the future into the present.
We have no need of false revolutions
In a world where categories tend to tyrannize our minds
And hang our wills up on narrow pegs.
It is well at every given moment to seek the limits in our lives.
And once those limits are understood
To understand that limitations no longer exist.
Earth could be fair. And you and I must be free
Not to save the world in a glorious crusade
Not to kill ourselves with a nameless gnawing pain
But to practice with all the skill of our being
The art of making possible.
Whatever she has been and done since - even with occasional wobbles - have brought her back full circle to this. I firmly believe this and am proud to support her candidacy.
May the best man (or woman) win the nomination!
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #70)
Curmudgeoness This message was self-deleted by its author.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Hillary has done far more for women's rights than Bernie has done for anyone's rights. Don't get me wrong -- Bernie's views are great and love what he is doing, but the fact is that Hillary is an inspiration to women around the world and has been active in a global context for a very long time. Let's not support Bernie by making Hillary look bad; even Bernie understands that.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)desperately they are trying to PREVENT people from doing so?
Lol, Bernie wins hands down when we stick to the issues.