2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWho do you believe will be the Democratic Nominee?
80 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Hillary Clinton | |
27 (34%) |
|
Bernie Sanders | |
53 (66%) |
|
Martin O'Malley | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
KMOD
(7,906 posts)This poll is not about who you are voting for, but who you believe will be the eventual nominee.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Thanks for voting in the poll.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Under two months from now we will start seeing who the citizens pick. Excited for Clinton!!!
Beginning to feel like people are going to ask me for my birth certificate. lol.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)murielm99
(31,566 posts)demosincebirth
(12,740 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Dem2
(8,178 posts)Just read the articles. I won't give them my clicks any longer.
Huffpo for trends, http://www.pollheadlines.com/poll-category.php?category=latest-polls for latest poll releases.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Gone, but never forgotten.
2naSalit
(94,064 posts)Don't harbor beliefs.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)I don't think there ever was a race.
Fearless
(18,458 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It won't be but it will be close to one. The party and it's base are unifying around Clinton. She is building momentum at just the right time.
comradebillyboy
(10,558 posts)and it looks like he may win there.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)Saying he'd lose every one was probably brash.
I'll amend it to almost every one.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)but with my abysmal record of getting who I want in presidential primaries - well, elections in general - it'll probably be the other person.
DFW
(56,972 posts)If you follow national trends and take them as they appear today, Hillary will be the nominee. However, that's what it looked like in 2007, too, at this point. So whoever it LOOKS like now, that could change with time.
The OP asked who we BELIEVE will be the nominee, not whom we support to be the nominee, and yet, some posts on here seem to be all about preference, which is NOT what the OP asked, and on which I haven't yet decided if I even have one.
BlueMTexpat
(15,511 posts)indicate "Hail Mary" hopes. Yes, a "Hail Mary" occasionally works ... but likely not in 2016.
For a "Hail Mary" to happen, Dem primary voters who currently support Hillary Clinton must desert her en masse at the polls. After all, it is Dem primary voters who must be convinced for any Dem candidate to get to the GE. En masse desertion from Hillary is highly unlikely ... especially with all the nastiness shown towards Hillary and her supporters on DU and other sites by self-styled Bernie "supporters." If anything, her supporters' resolve has been strengthened by such tactics.
This is not 2008. Period.
I didn't participate in your poll.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Most people aren't that interested in politics, and will never even see this 'nastiness' between the hardcore politics fans.
BlueMTexpat
(15,511 posts)deeply committed Hillary's supporters are. We are overwhelmingly composed of committed lifelong Dems who vote for Dems consistently, not simply for flashes in the pan who suddenly pop up in an election cycle - however attractive they may seem - who attract some voters who quite likely will desert them the second they do not demonstrate consistent purity or when they adapt to the requirements of the "establishment."
And yes, we committed supporters are very well aware of the nastiness. I believe that you underestimate that too.
Any Dem candidate in the GE must have the full support of the Dem establishment and the kinds of voters who, according to the polls, are leaning heavily towards Hillary. Dem endorsements also are heavily in Hillary's favor. People can rail against the "establishment" all they want and there is more than a kernel of truth in such railing. But without that support, a win in the GE is impossible.
The primaries will show whether I'm right or not. But the odds right now are definitely in Hillary's favor.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)As for how committed her supporters are, she's already lost one nomination battle, and this time that 'committed support' again seems to be strangely silent for the most part. The odds are in her favor on name recognition and coverage alone, but its far from over.
BlueMTexpat
(15,511 posts)was to the most charismatic Democratic candidate since JFK. And I was around for JFK (and FDR and HST for that matter, even though I was still too young to vote in those days).
Hillary didn't lose by that much in 2008 and she has learned from her mistakes then. The overwhelming part of the support that she had in 2008 is still with her - that's what real dedication is - even though we also voted for President Obama in the GE and supported him staunchly in 2012. In 2016, Hillary has gained support from many in groups who supported President Obama in the primaries in 2008. She also has an excellent track record as an effective SoS since then.
Is she perfect? No. But she is my choice and that will not change unless the primary results dictate otherwise.
We may seem "strangely silent" on DU simply because the overwhelming majority of us are not trying either to smear Bernie or the Dem "establishment" that you seem to hate so much. We instead prefer to champion Hillary and the Dems down-ticket that she can bring in on her coattails. That is very important. I haven't heard it mentioned here by Bernie supporters generally.
To win in the primaries, Bernie will need all of us to desert Hillary en masse, not just a piecemeal few. Just wait and see if that happens. It's highly unlikely.
In fact, even with MO'M's current low standing in the polls, I would bet that if any en masse desertions from Hillary take place for whatever reason, committed Dems would more naturally gravitate to MO'M. He is saying the same things Bernie is, has executive experience as Governor of one of our more populous states where he was respected by his colleagues (Chair of the Dem Governors), is a lifelong Dem and a committed liberal, fully understands the importance of down-ticket races, is younger than either Bernie or Hillary, and would indeed get full-throated endorsements from lifelong Dems.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)He has around 35% already, and is bringing in a ton of formerly disaffected Dem voters/Indys and moderate Republicans. Technically he doesn't need ANY current Hillary supporters to swing the race considering the tiny number of people who do actually vote in primaries. Obviously in practice that's not the case, but neither is the claim that Hillary's support is all rock solid and won't bend. A lot of Hillary supporters around the country still don't even know who Senator Sanders is. The political wonks like ourselves are the tiny minority nationally.
BlueMTexpat
(15,511 posts)please be my guest.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)just not seeing this from any of the national pollsters, showing a much much lesser crowd ready to vote for Bernie.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)And I'm completely open about it being a hope. The odds are still with Hillary, but 9 points in Iowa gives me real hope that she's beatable. If he wins there, the race is completely changed.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)To cling to...
What 9 ponts in Iowa? Are you also clinging to one poll?
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)She's ranked A+ by Nate Silver because she polls in a way that genuinely works in that state. Research her.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Why are Sanders supporters afraid to say?
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)When there are several others that say more...they seem to hang all their hopes on that one single poll...why does this person from Iowa negate all the others that say otherwise?
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Because its by the most accurate and respected Iowa pollster of course. Why else?
KMOD
(7,906 posts)I would love for the NY Jets to win the Super Bowl. But I don't believe they will.
get the red out
(13,645 posts)But I don't live in a state where it will matter.
I feel certain Hillary Clinton will be the nominee, and I will vote for her because I don't want people in this country to be destitute and our nation's safety net to be completely destroyed, AND Scalia clones replacing aging justices on the Supreme Court.
The Republican ideas are simply evil. Now they throw around phrases like "glow in the dark".
But I am VERY sick of having Hillary Clinton shoved down our throats! I have been pissed off about that for almost a decade, the "it's her turn" bull shit. I won't be excited to vote for her, but I will because I am so terrified of what Republicans plan.
BlueMTexpat
(15,511 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)and was nothing more than a fraudulent attempt at bilking Bernie supporters. They should rot in hell for the idiocy and lies they perpetrated.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)The comment was not meant in any way to reference the fraudulent rally. But you wanted to bring it up. I ask you: why?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)When I called out the fraudulent acts a few weeks ago, I was called a coward by a Du'er who was trying to promote attendance. So of course the name sort of stuck in my head. Too bad really because I understand that they had bought non refundable airline tickets to the event. The rally took the name, and ran with it over several attempts. I have never associated it with a "common Bernie utterance", just the rally. Happy?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)stonecutter357
(12,786 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Have HRC winning the Democratic nomination.
Which is a different question from who I would like to see win the Democratic nomination ... which a lot of people seem to be answering in this thread.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Renew Deal
(83,242 posts)Oh wait.
joshcryer
(62,511 posts)...I have to vote that Sanders is still quite the underdog and has a lot of momentum to gain to catch up. It's possible, but I am not deluded, it's a long shot. Hillary will probably win it.
But I will be sending a delegate to the convention, so it won't be me not fighting in my district.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)for which there is little momentum and next to no precedent. I'm basing this not on national polls but state polls, organizational effectiveness and primary sequence. Afer NH and IA it's a long southern/midwestern road for Sanders and I doubt the Twitterati have the machine politics worked out enough to sustain him in the face of Clinton's dominance there until more left-leaning states can give him a lift. To be sure there's always a chance that sweeping the first two states, itself a very tall order given IA data but caucuses rewardenthusiasm so it's not a done deal, might cause some kind of sudden "Well hell why not" switch among the less involved Dems who may be willing to vote in primaries, but his chances rest on either that or the surprising realization of the oft-prophesied but never seen emergence of a committed younger generation who will somehow decide to get out from behind their XBoxs and vote for a change.
Neither are all that probable I confess.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Except the very last time this happened you mean?
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)Obama had a much better organized nationwide support team, far more endorsements and much much better strength in the southern/midwest swing that comes after NH and IA.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)I know she lost her lead in 2008, but this isn't exactly the same.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)MineralMan
(148,150 posts)for the most part. It makes for an interesting comparison with some of the other polls.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)... Enough IS enough ....
If his candidacy fails, I will select Hillary on the General Election ballot, but only to block the GOP ... certainly not for love of her nominally conservative policy pronouncements ...
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)Glad to see that others will as well. I'd prefer O'Malley as the Dem candidate but will vote for whomever wins.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Back then 80% of this place was for Sanders...now it looks somewhat even. I wonder what changed?
KMOD
(7,906 posts)it's for who you believe will win the nomination.
Rex
(65,616 posts)So many Bernie supports believe HRC will win. Interesting poll.
Gothmog
(156,277 posts)She's dropping? Quelle horreur!