Can anyone name a "Liberal" site kicking members off without good reason?

[M Kitt]

http://www.thomhartmann.com/users/mfkmail7/blog/2016/01/renegade-du-site-member-kicked-twitter-commentary-follows

Think about it. Any site at all, give it a minute.

If that were the case, if you had been kicked off without recourse or reason give, if emails were not replied to and site management completely ignored personal requests, what would you do?

Per the above post, some of us have logged back on as "New Users" in violation of site policy, for purposes of complaint.

Which would of course be used as rationale for further "Violation" under site management authority

But hey, if you were running a "Group" and had complete control, if you could essentially snuff out all opposing viewpoints base on entirely partisan criteria, wouldn't you "Indulge"? Wouldn't you (perhaps) kick a member out of that group without notice, even if it were their first post on that Group?

Membership on any site isn't worth "Indulging" site management if they're prone to complete abuse of their authority. If group rules, when opposed, lead not only to being locked out of a group, but eventual lockout from the entire site for 12 days, would membership be worthwhile?

I'll eventually remove all of my posts from the particular site I'm referring to, it's not simply worth my efforts across 3 years to be kicked off of an entire site for a disagreement with a group "Manager". Essentially, that dictatorial "Power" is being supported by "Site Management", and to answer the question asked above, membership isn't worth being subjected to that kind of abuse.

Laterz.

[angstlessk]

1. Sugar I was banned in 2001 for stating the 'liberals'

were just trying to placate us...cause I wanted a revolution

It may have been so, but I was an army of one......BERNIE NOW HAS THE NATION BEHIND HIM!

[LiberalArkie]

2. Results

On Sat Feb 20, 2016, 09:17 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Can anyone name a "Liberal" site kicking members off without good reason?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/125210004

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This person posted this exact same OP in six different forums/groups on DU, all within six minutes. The intention here is to disrupt. A normal reaction would be to just stop posting.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511279831
http://www.democraticunderground.com/125210004
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10911540
http://www.democraticunderground.com/123049872
http://www.democraticunderground.com/118741663
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1186446

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Feb 20, 2016, 09:25 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This doesn't seem like a jury issue to me. I voted to leave it for this reason.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Disrupters gotta disrupt. BTW, a host of the HRC group doesn't have the power to kick you off the site. Tell the real story or STFU.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The poster is expressing an opinion. This is after all a discussion system. Look through the topics and you will boating, ham radio, cooking etc. It is a discussion system.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Provocative but no reason to protect anyone else from being able to see it.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.