Bloomberg Says Interpretation of Constitution Will ‘Have to Change’ After Boston Bombing

[Fire Walk With Me]

(Note: I only find this story at a single source which does not provide a link or date for the quoted content.)

http://politicker.com/2013/04/bloomberg-says-post-boston-interpretation-of-the-constitution-will-have-to-change/

In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Monday the country’s interpretation of the Constitution will “have to change” to allow for greater security to stave off future attacks.

“The people who are worried about privacy have a legitimate worry,” Mr. Bloomberg said during a press conference in Midtown. “But we live in a complex word where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.”

Mr. Bloomberg, who has come under fire for the N.Y.P.D.’s monitoring of Muslim communities and other aggressive tactics, said the rest of the country needs to learn from the attacks.

“Look, we live in a very dangerous world. We know there are people who want to take away our freedoms. New Yorkers probably know that as much if not more than anybody else after the terrible tragedy of 9/11,” he said.

(More at the link.)

[cprise]

1. One of globalization's facsists. n/t

[truebluegreen]

4. +100

[Demeter]

2. More dangerous than pioneering times?

methinks not.

[snappyturtle]

3. NO. nt

[msongs]

5. massive hysteria for a local crime that killed 4 people. all the nuts are loose nt

[pipoman]

6. He is a delusional cartoon character...

[Smarmie Doofus]

7. He's creeeeeeeeeepy. Had cops taking pics of teachers and parents demo-ing (legally)...

... outside of his mansion a few years ago.

Owns the media in NYC so no one really calls him on any of this.

He's Mayor Reichstag Fire.

[Newest Reality]

8. The people say that

the interpretation of Bloomburg will have to change after his Fascist Newspeak revealed his rotten core.

He's using an old line that is actually totally inaccurate and has a bushistic tone. They do not hate us for our freedoms, they despise our policies and blantant disregard for anything but control and profit.

So, when he says, "We know there are people who want to take away our freedoms" while he talks about giving them up essentially, one can easily denote that the "people" he is talking about includes him and his cronies.

There is no need at all to reinterpret the Constitution for the sake of predatory, shock and awe capitalists who, in the name of almighty profit and unbridled control, would like us all to become Serfs in their Neo-Techno-Fiefdom.

A resounding NO to that.

[grahamhgreen]

9. Did it change after the British burnt down the White House in 1812. No. F*ck this guy.

[Fire Walk With Me]

10. No one forget: He's a Plutonomist. A wall street billionaire who calls NYPD his "private army".

Their plans are becoming plain to see.

[Vincardog]

11. Let's start with HIS rights. Please publish his financial information as well as all his accounts

and their passwords. Then we can see if that information staves off future attacks.

[warrprayer]

12. it only gets worse

every time he opens his mouth