Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
Wed Nov 27, 2013, 07:05 PM Nov 2013

Judge narrows Occupy Wall Street protesters' claim vs NY police

A federal judge allowed claims of excessive force filed by two Occupy Wall Street protesters against New York police officers to move forward on Wednesday, but threw out their claims of false arrest.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote also dismissed all claims against New York City, finding that Heather Carpenter and her fiancé, Julio Jose Jimenez-Artunduaga, failed to show that the alleged excessive force reflected an "official policy" of the police department.

The lawsuit stems from an October 15, 2011, incident at a Citibank branch in downtown Manhattan at the height of the Occupy movement, which arose to protest economic inequality.

"Closing a bank account is, of course, lawful activity," Cote wrote. However, she said officers could reasonably conclude that by closing her account, she was engaging in protest activity in defiance of the bank's employees.
More at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/27/us-usa-occupy-lawsuit-idUSBRE9AQ14B20131127?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge narrows Occupy Wall Street protesters' claim vs NY police (Original Post) Joe Shlabotnik Nov 2013 OP
WTF indeed. Closing your account is grounds for arrest if the bank didn't want you to do it??? snot Nov 2013 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»Judge narrows Occupy Wall...