Occupy Underground
Related: About this forumAhead of FIFA’s World Cup, Police May “Pre-Arrest” Brazilian Activists
The Secretary of Public Security of São Paulo, Fernando Grella, told Reuters that police are preparing possible criminal charges against a small number of leaders of the protesters, who, he said, are conspiring to commit acts of violence, break, vandalize, assaulting people.
Its unclear whether the courts will allow such a violation of liberty and law, but the perpetrators of the initiative and their lawyers seem hopeful that they will make some preventative arrests. It will be tricky for them to try to charge unorganized groups with conspiracy charges, so naturally the state will have to frame people and create false scenarios of conspiracy between activists.
At least three political prisoners have been stuck with trumped up charges in Rio already.
Leme
(1,092 posts)I am quite unsure about anything in Brazil.
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)There was an authoritarian clamp down, just like many places where the Olympics have been held. The biggest difference was Sochi is a resort area with low population density, whereas the world cup sites are being held in densely populated urban spaces where a large segment are living in poverty, and being encroached upon by the wealthy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_issues_in_Brazil#Poverty
Want to Understand the 1992 LA Riots? Start with the 1984 LA Olympics http://www.thenation.com/blog/167630/want-understand-1992-la-riots-start-1984-la-olympics
dixiegrrrrl
(60,011 posts)The idea of "pre-crime" has been behind new techniques the fed and local law guys are working on.
Police are now using drones ( abut the size of a Cesan plane) to fly around LA and take video of what it happening on the ground in an effort to "predict" where crimes will be.
Feds are upping their collection of bio-metrics, again to be able to find "possible" crime patterns, by indentifying people they need to watch in case they do something.
It's coming.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)crimes by bankers, politicians, and the 1%.
Not because they are such upstanding citizens, but because they are the OWNERS and Lackeys of OWNERS.
If your 1% Elitists commit a crime against the 99%, who is going to call it a crime, in the first place, call them out on it in the second, and prosecute them, for a third?
dixiegrrrrl
(60,011 posts)Bank of England governor Mark Carney last night dismissed proposals to cap bankers bonuses as crude measures that will fail.
(that was a comment from Jan)
and here is his most recent argument AGAINST prosecuting bankers:
Merely prosecuting the guilty to the full extent of the law will not be sufficient to address the issues raised.
which brings me to the inescapable conclusion that hanging is the only solution.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)French Revolution Severance Package (FRSP)