Occupy Underground
Related: About this forumFrom Spain: A Charter for Democracy
The movement undeniably lives. Its form has been mutated, re-imagined, distributed, and coalesced into a swarm of activity and hacks to the system. We live here, we see it every day. These initiatives are not as easily seen, defined or, for that matter, targeted as a physical occupation may be; yet they permeate the hegemony, creating new possibilities and spaces. You need only look at the recent EU Parliamentary election results to see how Spanish voters have reacted to austerity and debt and how that reaction contrasted strongly with that of some other European nations. One of the most important evolutions of 15-M is undoubtedly the Movimiento por la Democracia (Movement for Democracy).
Unsurprisingly, the Movement is hard to define. It clearly targets the political arena without desiring to become a political party itself. Their Charter for Democracy is an inspiring, thorough text on what politics should be. It proposes a politics for the people: squarely grounded in environmental realities and social justice, based on the Commons, defended from corporate interests and neo-liberal dictates. The Charter was written collectively through nearly 30 different workshops throughout Spain held over the span of a year, with the collaboration of some 200 individuals.
As Movimiento por la Democracia expresses, It isnt finished. We dont want it to be finished; we want it to be a living document, in a constant state of discussion and production. We think its a good summary of the main demands the citizenry has put on the table over the last few years our needs and desires. Now we need your help. The Charter can only make sense when shared widely, so it can stir extensive debate. If you find it interesting, we ask you to share it on Social Media, send it by email or get it into peoples hands in a thousand different ways. We ask you to comment on it, debate it, refute and if you like it, make it yours.
To that end, were proud to present the Charter for Democracy in English for the first time, complete with its beautiful original illustrations by Clismón. Our role in this translation was something like post-production. We took the time to bring it together, polish and clarify it, to do service to the volunteer labor that went into the translation (see below for full credits). Its serious reading, and essential reading for anyone passionate about true democracy and commons-based governance. As they say, please read it and, if you want to, make it yours.
[IMG][/IMG]
The above, as well as the Charter, can be found here: http://guerrillatranslation.com/2014/06/26/a-charter-for-democracy/#fn1 (about 5,500 words)
Who is the Movimiento por la Democracia?
We emerged during the destruction of an economic and political model that, by its decadence, makes us poorer, excludes us, and exiles us from our own cities and towns. We are the people making life possible while the ship goes down . Were organized in collectives, groups, initiatives, and joined in friendships, networks, families and love.
We are the Movement for Democracy and we are here to transform our collective desire into new institutions and new laws. We are here to take democracy into our own hands, to defend against the constant threat of its systematic robbery. We are the nights of sleepless anguish spent thinking about jobs we dont have; we are also the joy in the rights we have won and defended.
We are the Movement for Democracy and we encourage you to banish all whove condemned us to a life of uncertainty and sorrow. Those that deny us our rights, that make like well never find out, never step up we are the Movement for Democracy and we came into being to say, Yes we can! a thousand times and more. And as we hold this to be true, that we actually can, we will challenge whoever tells us its impossible.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)I'll probably comment further in a while...
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)while the water shut-off is criminal, the response is amazing -
people are not writing letters to the newspaper, or circulating petitions on facebook,
they have taken matters into their own hands,
water brigades.
http://detroitwaterbrigade.org/
what an example of direct action and mutual help.
direct action and mutual help are much more common in Europe, than in US.
I see it as an off-shoot of occupy and the indignados.
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)(I've had some internet-fatigue for the last few months). It sounds like it has a high probability of success, as long as it can stay in the news, generate buzz, and show results. And, once again it shows that grassroots direct action and mutual aid are the most nimble and effective means of mitigating a disaster.
However, Detroit's water situation is simply a continuation of the disaster capitalism experiment that has been going on for years. I wish the brigade success and the residents relief, however the system that allowed this to happen, and the complicity of those in power, and silent complicity of those in positions of indirect influence is an atrocity.
People need relief, for sure, but the system must be reformed. If the system is beyond reform, then it must be replaced.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)AND the policies they actually pursued.
Many of these ideas would have broad support across the political spectrum.
- Control of representation. Revocable mandates by a social majority and absolute transparency both in public accounts and the actions of the various organs of Government. Tightening of controls and penalties related to corruption, and the development of independent supervisory authorities with competence over different public institutions. Economic and temporal limits on political appointments: salary caps; an incompatibility regime before, during and after the appointment; and effective limits on the duration of the mandate.
*** - Recognition and expansion of direct democracy tools, such as popular legislative initiatives, referendums and virtual tools of participation.
- Recognition of citizen control instruments in all areas of the main branches of government, as well as on public accounts. The recognition of such instruments requires transparency laws and the development of flexible mechanisms for public hearing. Recognition of other social organizations acting as control mechanisms or political representatives.
***
This one in particular would make the current financial elite crap their pants:
- Citizen Debt Audit. This proposal allows distinction between those debts which are legitimate and those which are not. This audit will be articulated as a social process of democratic and financial education, whereby citizens may acquire greater capacity for decision making and control over the financial economy.
I'd like to post chunks of this at a time, just to keep it at the top of discussion and get the ideas out there.
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)would be easily agreed upon by the majority of the 99% regardless of political affiliation. After all, transparency, accountability and penalties are (increasingly so) a cornerstone of proletarian identity and sense of responsibility.
Citizen debt audit, (and also, the Charter mentions a provision for a guaranteed basic income) are the among the most dangerous proposals. Both proposals would immediately nullifying what generations of citizens have simply accepted as 'the way it is'. The fact of the matter is that debt is merely a construct of the powerful to remain so, and meritocracy in relation to debt is a gimmick.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)I think that often, institutional debt holders have dubious claim to their entitlement of the debts they seek to collect. For example bankers that practice predatory lending to states or people, and representatives of states negotiate under duress or downright bad faith.
Similarly, how much is a debt really worth when it was created out of thin air by banks, and grows exponentially usurious, and what validity or moral authority does it have to collect from future generations?
Edit to add; not just banks, but increasingly, investment protection legislation that has enabled global corporations to extort astronomical reparations from countries. And then of course there are war reparations also, and neglected title claims of indigenous peoples too.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)And one a lot of people on DU don't want to hear.
I mean, there should be no criticism on account of: "Because Obama!" (Soon to be followed with "Because Hillary!"
I am very grateful to see the last point you recorded, i.e.:
This one in particular would make the current financial elite crap their pants:
Citizen Debt Audit. This proposal allows distinction between those debts which are legitimate and those which are not. This audit will be articulated as a social process of democratic and financial education, whereby citizens may acquire greater capacity for decision making and control over the financial economy.
You know, yurbud, I grew up in Chicago, and I can remember my dad discussing the Mafiosa, and its hold on people. I remember him saying with total disgust how awful it was that when the Mafia loaned people money, they did so at the rate of 150% a year.
These days, people who are making use of payday loan places are paying 900% interest a year. And Congress has done nothing about it. And here in California, you cannot even find out the terms of the agreement until after you have agreed to it!