Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
Fri Jul 4, 2014, 09:36 PM Jul 2014

From Spain: A Charter for Democracy

Whatever happened to the 15-M Movement? Where did Occupy go? Three years after the groundbreaking revolutionary ruptures of 2011, violent repression and media invisibility have relegated these thriving movements to a grey area. The perception seems to shift between mainstream derision and niche-group interest. Occupy’s roots have spread out and sprouted a multitude of initiatives, though perhaps the source inspiration is not always publicly recognized. But in Spain, the popular experience of austerity – the murderous palliative prescribed as a cure for the crisis – and the resulting political movements in reaction have been giving the lie to the mainstream narrative that 15-M is a “has been”.

The movement undeniably lives. Its form has been mutated, re-imagined, distributed, and coalesced into a swarm of activity and hacks to the system. We live here, we see it every day. These initiatives are not as easily seen, defined – or, for that matter, targeted – as a physical occupation may be; yet they permeate the hegemony, creating new possibilities and spaces. You need only look at the recent EU Parliamentary election results to see how Spanish voters have reacted to austerity and debt – and how that reaction contrasted strongly with that of some other European nations. One of the most important evolutions of 15-M is undoubtedly the “Movimiento por la Democracia” (Movement for Democracy).

Unsurprisingly, the Movement is hard to define. It clearly targets the political arena without desiring to become a political party itself. Their “Charter for Democracy” is an inspiring, thorough text on what politics should be. It proposes a politics for the people: squarely grounded in environmental realities and social justice, based on the Commons, defended from corporate interests and neo-liberal dictates. The Charter was written collectively through nearly 30 different workshops throughout Spain held over the span of a year, with the collaboration of some 200 individuals.

As Movimiento por la Democracia expresses, “It isn’t finished. We don’t want it to be finished; we want it to be a living document, in a constant state of discussion and production. We think it’s a good summary of the main demands the citizenry has put on the table over the last few years – our needs and desires. Now we need your help. The Charter can only make sense when shared widely, so it can stir extensive debate. If you find it interesting, we ask you to share it on Social Media, send it by email or get it into people’s hands in a thousand different ways. We ask you to comment on it, debate it, refute and if you like it, make it yours”.

To that end, we’re proud to present the Charter for Democracy in English for the first time, complete with its beautiful original illustrations by Clismón. Our role in this translation was something like post-production. We took the time to bring it together, polish and clarify it, to do service to the volunteer labor that went into the translation (see below for full credits). It’s serious reading, and essential reading for anyone passionate about true democracy and commons-based governance. As they say, please read it and, if you want to, make it yours.


[IMG][/IMG]

The above, as well as the Charter, can be found here: http://guerrillatranslation.com/2014/06/26/a-charter-for-democracy/#fn1 (about 5,500 words)


Who is the Movimiento por la Democracia?
We are the Movement for Democracy. Our movement was born after years spent in the streets, squares and networks. We were born in the wake of the Citizen Tides, from lessons learned through thousands of initiatives, evictions, struggles and actions.

We emerged during the destruction of an economic and political model that, by its decadence, makes us poorer, excludes us, and exiles us from our own cities and towns. We are the people making life possible while the ship goes down . We’re organized in collectives, groups, initiatives, and joined in friendships, networks, families and love.

We are the Movement for Democracy and we are here to transform our collective desire into new institutions and new laws. We are here to take democracy into our own hands, to defend against the constant threat of its systematic robbery. We are the nights of sleepless anguish spent thinking about jobs we don’t have; we are also the joy in the rights we have won and defended.

We are the Movement for Democracy and we encourage you to banish all who’ve condemned us to a life of uncertainty and sorrow. Those that deny us our rights, that make like we’ll never find out, never step up…we are the Movement for Democracy and we came into being to say, “Yes we can!” a thousand times and more. And as we hold this to be true, that we actually can, we will challenge whoever tells us it’s impossible.
more at: http://guerrillatranslation.com/movimiento-por-la-democracia/
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
From Spain: A Charter for Democracy (Original Post) Joe Shlabotnik Jul 2014 OP
Thanks, Joe. Ghost Dog Jul 2014 #1
many people think Occupy is dead. Look at Detroit ellenrr Jul 2014 #2
I'm just reading about the Detroit water brigade now. Joe Shlabotnik Jul 2014 #5
agree nt ellenrr Jul 2014 #9
this is crucial reading. If the Democratic Party was truly democratic, this would be their platform yurbud Jul 2014 #3
I think the first 3 points that you have selected, Joe Shlabotnik Jul 2014 #6
what do you mean "meritocracy in relation to debt is a gimmick"? yurbud Jul 2014 #7
To clarify, Joe Shlabotnik Jul 2014 #8
you got a lot in that original sentence then yurbud Jul 2014 #10
Very astute observation. truedelphi Jul 2014 #11
this is what the world is going to become. Only question is how much pain to get there yurbud Jul 2014 #4

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
2. many people think Occupy is dead. Look at Detroit
Sat Jul 5, 2014, 05:20 AM
Jul 2014

while the water shut-off is criminal, the response is amazing -
people are not writing letters to the newspaper, or circulating petitions on facebook,

they have taken matters into their own hands,
water brigades.
http://detroitwaterbrigade.org/

what an example of direct action and mutual help.

direct action and mutual help are much more common in Europe, than in US.
I see it as an off-shoot of occupy and the indignados.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
5. I'm just reading about the Detroit water brigade now.
Sat Jul 5, 2014, 03:27 PM
Jul 2014

(I've had some internet-fatigue for the last few months). It sounds like it has a high probability of success, as long as it can stay in the news, generate buzz, and show results. And, once again it shows that grassroots direct action and mutual aid are the most nimble and effective means of mitigating a disaster.

However, Detroit's water situation is simply a continuation of the disaster capitalism experiment that has been going on for years. I wish the brigade success and the residents relief, however the system that allowed this to happen, and the complicity of those in power, and silent complicity of those in positions of indirect influence is an atrocity.

People need relief, for sure, but the system must be reformed. If the system is beyond reform, then it must be replaced.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
3. this is crucial reading. If the Democratic Party was truly democratic, this would be their platform
Sat Jul 5, 2014, 01:57 PM
Jul 2014

AND the policies they actually pursued.

Many of these ideas would have broad support across the political spectrum.

  • Control of representation. Revocable mandates by a social majority and absolute transparency both in public accounts and the actions of the various organs of Government. Tightening of controls and penalties related to corruption, and the development of independent supervisory authorities with competence over different public institutions. Economic and temporal limits on political appointments: salary caps; an incompatibility regime before, during and after the appointment; and effective limits on the duration of the mandate.

    ***

  • Recognition and expansion of direct democracy tools, such as popular legislative initiatives, referendums and virtual tools of participation.

  • Recognition of citizen control instruments in all areas of the main branches of government, as well as on public accounts. The recognition of such instruments requires transparency laws and the development of flexible mechanisms for public hearing. Recognition of other social organizations acting as control mechanisms or political representatives.


***


This one in particular would make the current financial elite crap their pants:

  • Citizen Debt Audit. This proposal allows distinction between those debts which are legitimate and those which are not. This audit will be articulated as a social process of democratic and financial education, whereby citizens may acquire greater capacity for decision making and control over the financial economy.



I'd like to post chunks of this at a time, just to keep it at the top of discussion and get the ideas out there.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
6. I think the first 3 points that you have selected,
Sat Jul 5, 2014, 08:37 PM
Jul 2014

would be easily agreed upon by the majority of the 99% regardless of political affiliation. After all, transparency, accountability and penalties are (increasingly so) a cornerstone of proletarian identity and sense of responsibility.

Citizen debt audit, (and also, the Charter mentions a provision for a guaranteed basic income) are the among the most dangerous proposals. Both proposals would immediately nullifying what generations of citizens have simply accepted as 'the way it is'. The fact of the matter is that debt is merely a construct of the powerful to remain so, and meritocracy in relation to debt is a gimmick.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
8. To clarify,
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 03:59 PM
Jul 2014

I think that often, institutional debt holders have dubious claim to their entitlement of the debts they seek to collect. For example bankers that practice predatory lending to states or people, and representatives of states negotiate under duress or downright bad faith.

Similarly, how much is a debt really worth when it was created out of thin air by banks, and grows exponentially usurious, and what validity or moral authority does it have to collect from future generations?

Edit to add; not just banks, but increasingly, investment protection legislation that has enabled global corporations to extort astronomical reparations from countries. And then of course there are war reparations also, and neglected title claims of indigenous peoples too.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
11. Very astute observation.
Tue Jul 8, 2014, 03:20 PM
Jul 2014

And one a lot of people on DU don't want to hear.

I mean, there should be no criticism on account of: "Because Obama!" (Soon to be followed with "Because Hillary!&quot

I am very grateful to see the last point you recorded, i.e.:

This one in particular would make the current financial elite crap their pants:

Citizen Debt Audit. This proposal allows distinction between those debts which are legitimate and those which are not. This audit will be articulated as a social process of democratic and financial education, whereby citizens may acquire greater capacity for decision making and control over the financial economy.


You know, yurbud, I grew up in Chicago, and I can remember my dad discussing the Mafiosa, and its hold on people. I remember him saying with total disgust how awful it was that when the Mafia loaned people money, they did so at the rate of 150% a year.

These days, people who are making use of payday loan places are paying 900% interest a year. And Congress has done nothing about it. And here in California, you cannot even find out the terms of the agreement until after you have agreed to it!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»From Spain: A Charter for...