Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Occupy Underground
Related: About this forumThe revolution will not be patronized
http://news.salon.com/2012/03/05/the_revolution_will_not_be_patronized/Ben & Jerry founders Jerry Greenfield and Ben Cohen (top) and an Occupy Wall Street protester. (Credit: AP/Toby Talbot/John Minchillo)
When it comes to political process, Occupy has never taken the easy route. In eschewing representative politics, the movement is partly characterized by its commitment to consensus-based horizontal decision-making models. Its arduous meetings last for hours, tempers are frayed you learn to extend the limits of your patience.
So why, then, when it comes to funding, would Occupy opt for the easy way?
In the past week, the offer of easy money came knocking. Ice cream moguls Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield of Ben & Jerrys, along with former Nirvana manager Danny Goldberg, want to be Occupy benefactors with an aim to raise $1.8 million for Occupy-related projects through a 501(c)(3) called the Movement Resource Group (MRG). As Jeff Smith, a member of the Occupy Wall Street press team, described the project in a post on the Daily Beast, the 501(c)(3) is the latest incarnation of a group of wealthy donors who have been trying to plug into OWS for months.
$300,000 has already been raised, largely by Cohens foundation. $150,000 would go to a national office in New York for Occupy operations. The other funds would go to national grants of up to $25,000 (proposals for these must go through a board made up of five rich people and five occupiers selected by those rich people, as Smith put it). Other grants and stipends would support projects and core activists, as determined by MRG.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2115 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The revolution will not be patronized (Original Post)
xchrom
Mar 2012
OP
TBF
(34,294 posts)1. I guess this will have to be a learning experience for them. nt
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)2. The donors or the recipients?
Both may be in for some new experiences.
unionworks
(3,574 posts)3. Ben and Jerry
Are good people. And Occupy needs funding.
TBF
(34,294 posts)4. Ben and Jerry sold their company to Unilever -
Occupy selling out to corporate money is not a good thing in my view.
unionworks
(3,574 posts)6. Wow you are right
I just looked it up. That does present a problem.
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)5. Forming a panel to judge OWS projects was never going to fly.