Robert Whitaker speaks at NAMI
The conversation has begun!
Kathy Brandt, a former President of NAMI, writes of her experience listening to Robert Whitaker at the NAMI convention. YES!! NAMI had Robert Whitaker speak at the convention. This is very very good news.
This is a piece of what Kathy writes:
The Case Against Excessive Use of Antipsychotics
Whitaker’s findings, if true, would require a new paradigm of treatment, one that might require that someone who is psychotic be given “asylum,” or “refuge,” a place to rest and recover with limited or no antipsychotics, using other effective treatments that include more than just medication. That seems impossible in our country, where the mental health care system is practically non-existent; where people are hospitalized for 3-5 days and released with a bag of samples and prescriptions; where insurance companies dictate release, arguing that recovery can take place outside of the hospital; and where too many psychiatric units are just holding tanks where little good treatment occurs. If Whitaker’s findings prove true, it will take decades to address them and it will take money. How can that happen in a country where we don’t provide even minimal care and where funding continues to be cut?
By the time Whitaker concluded his talk, the room was heavy with anger, despair, and fear. Some people were angry at Whitaker for presenting studies that could prove inaccurate and yet could have such an impact on so many. Others were angry at psychiatrists and big pharma for promoting medication that could be harmful. Most difficult for those with mental illness and their families, me included, was the fear that the medicine we have relied on was damaging and that we had put our trust in the wrong hands.
My son, who as you’ll remember was sitting right beside me during Whitaker’s talk, is angry, very angry about what he heard, angry at doctors and the pharmaceutical industry. And I am scared that he will decide to quit taking the one antipsychotic he is on, and I’m confused about whether he should. He’s been stable, healthy, and happy for several years. What will happen if he stops? Will he fall back into the pit of mania and psychosis, end up on the streets as has happened so many times before? He’s agreed he’ll speak with his doctor about what he’s heard, but I find myself wishing that our family could move to Finland. (read more)
It’s clear that it’s a very scary process for many people who are first encountering the power of this research and information. Those of us who have been understanding and living the truth of this information for so many years have a hard time understanding what it’s like to encounter such truths for the first time. Some of us who’ve found much more wholesome ways to heal were able to avoid the harm psychiatry causes, so that means that many of us really don’t know what it’s like to have gone down the road of taking drugs that harm and believing them to be healing agents.
http://beyondmeds.com/2013/07/05/the-conversation-has-begun-nami-has-robert-whitaker-speak-at-convention-nami-member-responds/

Tobin S.
(10,420 posts)I have found no better treatment for my psychotic symptoms than anti-psychotic medication. I've been taking an atypical anti-psychotic for ten years and I'm not experiencing any short or long term side effects. I think I'll continue on my current path.
olddots
(10,237 posts)information of any sort is helpful ,we have been playing roulette with the insurance game for years with our daughter's illness that is both mental and physical .
ellenrr
(3,865 posts)it is to have your daughter sick, and on top of that to have to deal w/insurance.