Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Guns are cuddly security blankets: How the media helps right-wing gun nuts push propaganda
Conservative politicians and pundits lie and distort far more than liberals do. At the same time, conservatives have a well-known persecution complex, frequently accusing the mainstream media of having some secret anti-conservative agenda. This puts mainstream media fact-checkers in an unenviable situation, trying to seem balanced in an environment where one side simply has more enthusiasm for lying than the other. Now the pressure to overemphasis or even exaggerate claims of liberal mendacity, in an attempt to seem more balanced, has infected Glenn Kesslers coverage of the gun debate in the Washington Post.
Our tale begins with a speech by President Obama where he said, We know that states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest gun deaths. So the notion that gun laws dont work, or just will make it harder for law-abiding citizens and criminals will still get their guns is not borne out by the evidence. This is, as Kesslers investigation demonstrated, a true statement. The statistics are complicated by demographic and social factors, but overall, the data shows a direct correlation between how easy it is to get a gun and how many people die from gunshot wounds. But Kessler gave Obama two Pinocchiosout of four Pinocchio scaleto this claim.
Many readers requested a fact check of this statement, believing it to be untrue, Kessler writes. Ill bet they did! Conservative fetishization of guns is at a point where even suggesting that guns might be unsafe is treated like youre insulting their mother, so of course theyre going to be outraged that Obama dare suggest that objects created for the sole purpose of killing might be very good at making people dead. Its understandable that, deluged by all that conservative outrage, one might give into the urge to show that youre not biased by giving them what they want. But unfortunately, Kessler, despite being a fact-checker, ends up heavily massaging the statistics to give conservative readers those Pinocchios they desperately want.
To get to the conclusion that Obama fudged the facts, Kessler starts by manipulating the data that Obama used for his claim, by removing suicides from the number of overall gun deaths. He justifies this by arguing the presidents policy proposals are aimed at mass shootings, not suicides. But that is, in and of itself, a false statement. While Obama did focus heavily on mass shooting in his speech, its clear that he was making a larger point about how the proliferation of guns in our society leads to more gun deaths. There is a gun for roughly every man, woman, and child in America, Obama said right before the sentences in question. So how can you, with a straight face, make the argument that more guns will make us safer? Its clear that he was speaking about how a gun-fanatical society is one where people get shot to death a lot, and not just in the context of mass shootings.
Link
Our tale begins with a speech by President Obama where he said, We know that states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest gun deaths. So the notion that gun laws dont work, or just will make it harder for law-abiding citizens and criminals will still get their guns is not borne out by the evidence. This is, as Kesslers investigation demonstrated, a true statement. The statistics are complicated by demographic and social factors, but overall, the data shows a direct correlation between how easy it is to get a gun and how many people die from gunshot wounds. But Kessler gave Obama two Pinocchiosout of four Pinocchio scaleto this claim.
Many readers requested a fact check of this statement, believing it to be untrue, Kessler writes. Ill bet they did! Conservative fetishization of guns is at a point where even suggesting that guns might be unsafe is treated like youre insulting their mother, so of course theyre going to be outraged that Obama dare suggest that objects created for the sole purpose of killing might be very good at making people dead. Its understandable that, deluged by all that conservative outrage, one might give into the urge to show that youre not biased by giving them what they want. But unfortunately, Kessler, despite being a fact-checker, ends up heavily massaging the statistics to give conservative readers those Pinocchios they desperately want.
To get to the conclusion that Obama fudged the facts, Kessler starts by manipulating the data that Obama used for his claim, by removing suicides from the number of overall gun deaths. He justifies this by arguing the presidents policy proposals are aimed at mass shootings, not suicides. But that is, in and of itself, a false statement. While Obama did focus heavily on mass shooting in his speech, its clear that he was making a larger point about how the proliferation of guns in our society leads to more gun deaths. There is a gun for roughly every man, woman, and child in America, Obama said right before the sentences in question. So how can you, with a straight face, make the argument that more guns will make us safer? Its clear that he was speaking about how a gun-fanatical society is one where people get shot to death a lot, and not just in the context of mass shootings.
Link
Seems to be a considerable amount of NRA damage control going on recently, even here on DU, and complete with the same fact distortions and outright lies as used by the right-wing gun worshipers. Could it be that Wayne LaPierre, Ted Nugent, Larry Pratt, and the rest of the right-wing gun nut "leadership" are getting nervous about all of the bad publicity in the news lately?
The gun control movement is growing in number and size with more and more organizations reaching more Americans with the common sense notion of regulating a dangerous consumer product (what a concept). Lend your voice and support to the movement to rein in the madness and mayhem caused by guns in our country.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1901 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guns are cuddly security blankets: How the media helps right-wing gun nuts push propaganda (Original Post)
billh58
Jun 2016
OP
pansypoo53219
(21,724 posts)1. adult pacifyers.
billh58
(6,641 posts)2. Much worse than that...
See the face of the right-wing gun culture in the United States:
Larry Pratt, the former executive director of Gun Owners of America, added Hillary Clinton this week to the list of public officials who he has warned will face violence from gun owners if they impose regulations on guns.
Pratt, who said last month that if conservatives lose at the ballot box they might have to resort to the bullet box, said in an interview on the Crosstalk radio program on Tuesday that Clintons support for some gun regulations may be an attempt to disarm civilians so that she can impose tyranny.
The Second Amendment means, he told Clinton, that if you even try to go off in a tyrannical direction, the Constitution protects the peoples right to protect the people themselves against people like you.
-Snip-
Pratt has made similar comments about other public officials including President Obama, Rep. Carolyn Maloney and Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/larry-pratt-gun-owners-keeping-hillary-clinton-imposing-tyranny?
Pratt, who said last month that if conservatives lose at the ballot box they might have to resort to the bullet box, said in an interview on the Crosstalk radio program on Tuesday that Clintons support for some gun regulations may be an attempt to disarm civilians so that she can impose tyranny.
The Second Amendment means, he told Clinton, that if you even try to go off in a tyrannical direction, the Constitution protects the peoples right to protect the people themselves against people like you.
-Snip-
Pratt has made similar comments about other public officials including President Obama, Rep. Carolyn Maloney and Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/larry-pratt-gun-owners-keeping-hillary-clinton-imposing-tyranny?
This asshat represents the fine, upstanding Americans who make up the irresponsible, extremist segment of the "responsible" gun owners in our country. Along with the NRA right-wing gun nuts, they represent a sizable portion of the gun culture on our streets, and in our communities.
They are dangerous individuals bearing dangerous lethal weapons.