Maryland's model for gun regulation
Tomorrow, Gov. Martin O'Malley plans to sign into law the most comprehensive gun control legislation Maryland has seen in at least 25 years, a bill that will not only help guard against a mass shooting incident, like December's massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School, but will also help fight the day-to-day violence that plagues Baltimore and other communities. The bill has become doubly important with the failure at least for the moment of attempts to tighten gun laws on the federal level, both because it will make Marylanders safer and because it can serve as a model for other states as they seek ways to address gun violence.
The bill, which was the centerpiece of Mr. O'Malley's agenda in this year's General Assembly session, was watered down only slightly by the legislature, and in some respects was improved. It bans a variety of assault weapons, limits ammunition magazines to no more than 10 rounds, tightens the standards by which someone can be banned from purchasing a gun because of mental illness and, perhaps most crucially, institutes a licensing system that requires prospective handgun buyers to provide their fingerprints and undergo training. Previously, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence had placed Maryland in the third tier of states for the effectiveness of its gun laws; these measures should elevate it to near the top of the rankings.
Despite the use of assault weapons with large ammunition magazines in the recent mass shootings in Newtown, Conn., and Aurora, Colo., Congress showed almost no appetite for reviving the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 or for limiting the size of clips. Despite polling showing that as much as 90 percent of the public supports closing the loophole that allows private sales at gun shows, over the Internet and elsewhere to take place without a required background check, and despite the bipartisan effort of pro-gun Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania to craft compromise legislation on the issue, that loophole remains in federal law as well.
But like Maryland, Connecticut and New York enacted strict assault weapons bans. Those states and Colorado enacted limits on magazine sizes. Rhode Island legislators are considering assault weapons and magazine size bills right now. Colorado, Connecticut and Delaware passed universal background checks. (Maryland and New York already had them.) Delaware and Maryland both enacted reporting requirements for lost or stolen guns. New Jersey is considering a measure to strengthen its registration system for gun buyers and, like Maryland, to require firearms training.
To be sure, some deeply pro-gun states actually expanded firearm rights South Dakota, for example, decided to allow teachers to carry guns in the classroom. But overall, the increase in gun control measures considered by state legislatures this year far outstripped the rise in pro-gun bills, according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Considering how little momentum gun control advocates had on the state level in recent years, even in liberal states like Maryland, that is progress.
Read More: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/editorial/bs-ed-gun-bill-20130515,0,1426888.story
rightsideout
(978 posts)They are ready to leave the state of Maryland. LOL. Good. Go!
I can't believe how many of my HS classmates are Republican thugs. It appears I'm the only one that left the Dark Side.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Probably the most important part is the licensing and fingerprinting for handgun purchasers.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Decoy of Fenris
(1,954 posts)Certainly less reactionary than some other legislation. Aside from the "scary-looking rifle" clause, this is the kind of lawmaking I can get behind.
spin
(17,493 posts)at the state level.
If strong gun control legislation reduces crime in the states that pass it, it could be used as a model for future national gun laws.
I should point out that I am a gun rights advocate but I have no problem with experimenting with ideas that differ from mine in order to see if they actually work.
Bazinga
(331 posts)Or is the fourth paragraph just a misrepresentation of online classifieds where the private sale still happens face toface within state borders?
I ask because I oppose the former and believe the federal government has the right to regulate interstate commerce (and unless I'm mistaken, this is already illegal). The latter, however, I believe should be allowed to continue as long as we can find a way to ensure that these transactions involve two people who are not barred from owning firearms.
My current preference would be an NICS system open to public notaries that allows the purchaser to demonstrate that they have passed a background check by obtaining a document to that effect.
Robb
(39,665 posts)...you'll note the author is lamenting that the "loophole" allows private sales over the Internet and elsewhere without background checks.
The author does not want to outlaw private sales, only ensure the individuals involved are permitted to conduct them. You agree.