Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimmy the one

(2,717 posts)
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 10:58 AM Jun 2014

Gunnut Claim ruled FALSE by politifact

FALSE: New Hampshire Republican Jim Rubens says armed civilians drastically reduce casualties during mass shootings ... Says when armed civilians stop mass shootings with guns, an average of 2.5 people die; otherwise, an average of 18 people die. (I think/glean that Rubens is in the GOP primary with scott brown to run for senator).

Refutal: ..an academic study published in an FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin by Dr. Pete Blair, dir of research Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Center (ALERRT) and assoc prof criminal justice Texas State Uni...

Blair and two other researchers examined more than 100 shootings between 2000 and 2012, investigating factors such as average response time of law enforcement and outcomes based on the actions taken by civilians at the scene... the study found the median number of people shot is 5 (excluding the perpetrator).
.. Blair said it’s logical to assume casualties would be lower when civilians intervene before police arrive, but his research documented very few incidents that were actually stopped because a civilian was carrying a gun..... Blair said he found only three cases in which an armed civilian shot the attacker, and in two of those incidents, the civilian who took action was an off-duty police officer.

Roughly half of all active shooter events Blair studied ended before law enforcement officers arrived. The most common occurrence was that the shooter stopped the attack spontaneously on their own. .. When those who remained either ran away or barricaded themselves, shooters often made the decision to leave the attack site or commit suicide..

Blair said he also documented cases in which civilians took direct action. Civilians stopped about one out of every six active shooter events, but their actions rarely involved the use of firearms.. The most common method was tackling the attacker, as was the case during a campus shooting in Seattle this week.

Blair said it would be difficult to draw any conclusions about the effectiveness of armed civilians in stopping active shooter events based on the limited data that exists. In general though, Blair said, fewer people were killed or injured in the events that ended before police showed up at the scene -- either because {UNARMED} civilians took action, or because the shooter spontaneously stopped or committed suicide.
http://www.politifact.com/new-hampshire/statements/2014/jun/06/jim-rubens/jim-rubens-says-when-armed-civilians-stop-mass-sho/

Another canard from the 2nd Amendment Mythology Bible, bites the dust.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gunnut Claim ruled FALSE by politifact (Original Post) jimmy the one Jun 2014 OP
Just more NRA billh58 Jun 2014 #1
not even convince--just delay cohesion and activism MisterP Jun 2014 #3
Ruben's numbers are indeed total horse manure. mn9driver Jun 2014 #2
Yes, these yahoos walking around thinking their Rambo are bullshitting themselves to infinity BrotherIvan Jun 2014 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #5
You're in the wrong billh58 Jun 2014 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #7
Enjoy your billh58 Jun 2014 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #9
Another gun nut billh58 Jun 2014 #10
more crud from ted jimmy the one Jun 2014 #11
K&R n/t billh58 Jun 2014 #12

billh58

(6,641 posts)
1. Just more NRA
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:23 AM
Jun 2014

bullshit that has been debunked many times, but still repeated (even on DU) in the hopes that the public will eventually believe their lies. The right-wing gun lobby propaganda machine is running out of steam, and the American public is rapidly growing tired of their so-called "political influence."

A handful of very vocal Second Amendment absolutists and NRA apologists are scrambling on DU to defend those who have recently been in the news for high-profile shooting deaths and injuries, and their "rights" to have any gun for any purpose. Sensible gun control is being enacted around the country as we speak, and these gun nuts are sticking their heads in the gun powder and hoping the growing gun control movement will just go away.

News flash: Gun Control organizations will continue to grow until politicians will fear them more than the right-wing gun lobby.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
3. not even convince--just delay cohesion and activism
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 12:19 PM
Jun 2014

with enough smoke you don't need anyone to worry if there's a fire!

it's the same reason any old myths get repeated: they circulate within a small group and just keep getting spit back out at intervals: I've seen some eccentricities get kicked around like cans for 180 years

and if anyone challenges them their whole field's just dismissed out of hand ... (or they're accused of being a NWO/Jesuit plant!)

mn9driver

(4,576 posts)
2. Ruben's numbers are indeed total horse manure.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 11:33 AM
Jun 2014

But gunners won't even bat an eye. They will interpret the Politifact article as making it clear that more armed civilians are needed.

Guaranteed.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
4. Yes, these yahoos walking around thinking their Rambo are bullshitting themselves to infinity
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 02:23 PM
Jun 2014

The off duty officer would have been trained to react under pressure, the weekend warrior & target shooter not so much. I saw an episode of "I Survived" where a shooter comes into a small town restaurant. Everyone ducks for cover and guy is going around shooting people. A friend of the narrator has a gun and decides he's going to "take out" the shooter. He gets up shooting and completely misses, and the shooter with his larger weapons, turns, shoots and kills the guy. So much for a good guy with a gun.

And while there may be a few stories of someone protecting themselves from a home intruder, there are so many more of the gun being used to kill someone in drunken stupidity or accidental discharge. If there were so many good guy with a gun stories, we'd surely hear about them from the NRA. They're only interested in selling guns, period. Fuck them.

Response to jimmy the one (Original post)

Response to billh58 (Reply #6)

Response to billh58 (Reply #8)

jimmy the one

(2,717 posts)
11. more crud from ted
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 01:24 PM
Jun 2014

Not really gunny but more sh** from ted the sh**hed, disproved by politifact:

politifact: Ted Nugent, the one-time rock guitarist turned Second Amendment rights activist, could probably stand to brush up on his Web surfing skills.
A few days ago, Nugent posted a horrific photo on Facebook of a bearded man, bloody knife in hand, squatting behind five gory heads. "One of the subhuman mongrels our president set free," Nugent wrote in the caption. "Feel safer yet?" (Nugent created a controversy earlier this year when he called President Barack Obama a "subhuman mongrel.&quot

we wanted to check whether the man in the photo is one of the five Taliban leaders released from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in exchange for Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl.
He is not and there is no way that he could be.
The image reportedly was tweeted by the man in the photo on March 15 and not one of the five Taliban prisoners. ... For starters, the five Taliban officials were released May 31, 2014, more than two months after the image was first released.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/jun/16/ted-nugent/nugent-ties-gory-photo-bergdahl-prisoner-swap/

Why does the nra allow this 'subhuman gunnut' to remain on it's board of directors? imagine if a gun control group had some equivalent to this creep.

(Politifact did judge Obama's 'people can keep existing doctors under obamacare' as the number one lie last year, but Obama & politifact should get some slack on that since it wasn't intentional, just a quirk which arose from the plan's implementation, acknowledged by obama & is being corrected. Contrast with ted nugents malicious drivel.)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Gunnut Claim ruled FALSE ...