Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Elizabeth Warren
Related: About this forumThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (Cali_Democrat) on Sat Dec 28, 2013, 03:31 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1782 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post)
Cali_Democrat
Dec 2013
OP
"Would introduce a variety of measures to improve the military's handling of sexual assault cases."
arcane1
Dec 2013
#1
Headlilne "Elizabeth Warren Votes to be Strong on Defense and Steals Republican Talking Point."
Agnosticsherbet
Dec 2013
#3
Yes, can't wait to hear this one. Point? There is no point, that's the point.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2013
#5
arcane1
(38,613 posts)1. "Would introduce a variety of measures to improve the military's handling of sexual assault cases."
Why not say "Elizabeth Warren rightfully voted for that"?
The rest of it is a mess, but you can't blame it all on her.
"Elizabeth Warren votes for a defense bill which authorizes a variety of measures to improve the military's handling of sexual assault cases."
That's the headline.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
pscot
(21,037 posts)2. You have to pick your battles
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)3. Headlilne "Elizabeth Warren Votes to be Strong on Defense and Steals Republican Talking Point."
You can spin this shit anyway you want.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
grantcart
(53,061 posts)4. What is the point of your OP and posting it in the Elizabeth Warren group?
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,544 posts)5. Yes, can't wait to hear this one. Point? There is no point, that's the point.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)6. Suspect That The Hillary Supporters Are Working To Spread FUD
eom
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions