Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Elizabeth Warren
Related: About this forumElizabeth Warren On New Leadership Position: 'Nobody's Clipping My Wings' - HuffPo
X-Posted from GD:
Elizabeth Warren On New Leadership Position: 'Nobody's Clipping My Wings'
Ryan Grim & Amanda Terkel - HuffPo
Posted: 11/13/2014 11:27 pm EST Updated: 11/14/2014 12:18 am EST
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) pushed back Thursday evening against the notion that her new Senate position means that she will be a "liberal liaison" between Democratic leaders and the party's progressive base. "I don't quite understand it," said Warren of the oft-repeated, informal title that's been used in media reports to describe her new leadership position.
Warren's elevation was ratified Thursday during a more than three-hour, closed-door meeting, where Democrats elected their new Senate leaders for the next Congress. Warren's role had not previously been disclosed to the caucus, having only been reported as a possibility by HuffPost the afternoon before. Before the meeting had ended, reporters were being told by sources outside Reid's office that Warren would be a "liberal liaison," and would additionally hold a policy portfolio.
But Warren, in an interview with HuffPost, said the liberal part was news to her. "Harry asked me to be a strategic policy adviser, because that's what I talk about, I talk about policy -- college affordability and minimum wage and Social Security," she said. "And that's what I'm supposed to do and that's what I will do. That's my portfolio."
The notion that Senate leadership needs a liaison to liberals struck many of those liberals as the wrong prescription. David Firestone noted in The New York Times the title "sounds a bit like an ambassador to a distant country. Tell us, senator, what your liberal friends will say if we do this or that. A mere liaison is not what the Democrats need right now."
Warren said that she and Reid began discussing the position in the last week or so, and that she wanted the position so that she could be in the weekly leadership meetings where decisions on the agenda are made. "This is a seat at the table. ... I plan to use it to make sure that people around this country have a real hearing," she said. "I want a chance to be at the table when the Democratic leadership is making decisions. It gives me a better chance to fight for what I believe in."
Backers of Warren said they worried her ascendance to leadership may diminish her ability to be a strong outside voice.
Warren's elevation was ratified Thursday during a more than three-hour, closed-door meeting, where Democrats elected their new Senate leaders for the next Congress. Warren's role had not previously been disclosed to the caucus, having only been reported as a possibility by HuffPost the afternoon before. Before the meeting had ended, reporters were being told by sources outside Reid's office that Warren would be a "liberal liaison," and would additionally hold a policy portfolio.
But Warren, in an interview with HuffPost, said the liberal part was news to her. "Harry asked me to be a strategic policy adviser, because that's what I talk about, I talk about policy -- college affordability and minimum wage and Social Security," she said. "And that's what I'm supposed to do and that's what I will do. That's my portfolio."
The notion that Senate leadership needs a liaison to liberals struck many of those liberals as the wrong prescription. David Firestone noted in The New York Times the title "sounds a bit like an ambassador to a distant country. Tell us, senator, what your liberal friends will say if we do this or that. A mere liaison is not what the Democrats need right now."
Warren said that she and Reid began discussing the position in the last week or so, and that she wanted the position so that she could be in the weekly leadership meetings where decisions on the agenda are made. "This is a seat at the table. ... I plan to use it to make sure that people around this country have a real hearing," she said. "I want a chance to be at the table when the Democratic leadership is making decisions. It gives me a better chance to fight for what I believe in."
Backers of Warren said they worried her ascendance to leadership may diminish her ability to be a strong outside voice.
And...
Either way, said Warren, her new leadership role won't stop her from speaking out. "Nobody's clipping my wings," she said.
Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/13/elizabeth-warren-senate-liason_n_6156066.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1474 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elizabeth Warren On New Leadership Position: 'Nobody's Clipping My Wings' - HuffPo (Original Post)
WillyT
Nov 2014
OP
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)1. Could it be...
Warren's policies are "liberal" and the Senate Democratic leadership is unfamiliar with "liberal" policies?
pscot
(21,037 posts)3. Sounds more like Reid wants
to do something about reconnecting the Democratic party to its base.